"Not involved" rule

[GeeMayn]

This is a useless rule.
Even when a user posts very useful evidence, he gets warned because he's "not involved".

What's the point of this rule?

[kronik]

Actually, the rule is not to post if you have no evidence and were not involved.  If you have evidence you are allowed to post it, just make sure it's screenshots or videos because copy and pasting something doesn't count as evidence.  Also, don't post just to say you witnessed it because that doesn't count as proof either.

[JF]

What Kronik said.

Locked.

[Nicknero]

Just to add: this rule was set because admins don't want to scroll through 3 pages of useless arguments and flamewars just to find some more useful evidence. Only post if you have useful evidence that helps the admin make a verdict, and you won't get warned.