If any problems arise from the bunker being open and people cant learn to share it, I'm more then willing to take it away. Even if that means nuking it.
It will continue as is ic'ly and no OOC intervention.If rules are broken and complaints and all that shit happen, then there will be OOC intervention in the form of a super-admin dealing with the problem.
I dont believe you have a say in this since you have a character currently in the group claiming it. That could explain your defending of it. Like really. The reason my group in ineu valley owned the bunker was because it was a gift from waffle for committing so much time on the map. Even then i gave it up after a few months and it was open to the public, apart from the back area as people kept assaulting people but thats a different story. Point is, why are you defending it so much? It seems to me you intend for shit to happen and to claim it. You havent reassured anyone yet you wont.
Alright ill hold your word for it. We can all agree on these terms then?
Quote from: Statua on April 03, 2013, 02:04:08 AMThe reason the bunker was sealed in the first place was to prevent IC claiming right away. Claiming of a major area causes problems, especially if it's in the wrong hands. And yes, we can OOCly intervene. If thats not the case then unpk Beans. As serious of a server as we are, we cant let shit fly freely. We need to make sure the server doesn't turn to shit so OOC intervention may take place.correct me if im mistaken but khub (a superadmin who outranks you) stated otherwise that admins cannot intervene in IC matters unless rules are being broken, and an example of that would be the beans situationwhat's the point in having creativity and conflict in roleplay if admins are going to intervene and prevent anything fun from occuring?
The reason the bunker was sealed in the first place was to prevent IC claiming right away. Claiming of a major area causes problems, especially if it's in the wrong hands. And yes, we can OOCly intervene. If thats not the case then unpk Beans. As serious of a server as we are, we cant let shit fly freely. We need to make sure the server doesn't turn to shit so OOC intervention may take place.
Quote from: raged on April 03, 2013, 02:48:04 AMQuote from: Statua on April 03, 2013, 02:04:08 AMThe reason the bunker was sealed in the first place was to prevent IC claiming right away. Claiming of a major area causes problems, especially if it's in the wrong hands. And yes, we can OOCly intervene. If thats not the case then unpk Beans. As serious of a server as we are, we cant let shit fly freely. We need to make sure the server doesn't turn to shit so OOC intervention may take place.correct me if im mistaken but khub (a superadmin who outranks you) stated otherwise that admins cannot intervene in IC matters unless rules are being broken, and an example of that would be the beans situationwhat's the point in having creativity and conflict in roleplay if admins are going to intervene and prevent anything fun from occuring?This. It was always my desire for Outlands to be more chaotic, I mean, if two IC factions war over the bunker, so what? If some bandit characters hole up in the bunker and take it over, so what? Hell, what if the Overwatch snipe people at the bunker? What then? It shouldn't be the admins' actions that dictate IC matters, it just doesn't make sense to me in any other way than being favouritism. Stuff happens. People fight, like people would do in cases such as these in real life I would reckon, if the admins want to create some order, they shouldn't use their position, they should make their characters, form a group, and do it all In Character, whilst keeping their duties as administrators out of it unless, of course, rules are broken.
>No matter what happens, no matter how old I get.>I'll never forget...>Fats Mcgee. And his Retard Three.
but i said that first
Quote from: raged on April 04, 2013, 01:09:05 AMbut i said that firstI love you both equally for the support raged. Still, I agree with you both. But for the sake of an emotion filled response, from others who disagree, i'll just remain neutral since apparently I don't have a say in it.