Catalyst Gaming

General => General Discussion => Social Discussion => Topic started by: Pielolz on November 01, 2012, 01:59:58 AM

Title: Same sex marriage
Post by: Pielolz on November 01, 2012, 01:59:58 AM
I recently encountered a gent that severely opposed this topic, saying "God made it adam and eve, not adam and steve." I took offense to this; gay marriage hurts nothing and no one, such excuse would mean little in congress, and why deny the right to marry to some one? All men are created equal, but when will we actually respect that?

Please, I want to hear your opinions.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: wakeboarderCWB on November 01, 2012, 06:48:09 AM
Personally, I am against it. My biology teacher once told me, "God put you on this Earth to reproduce." How can you reproduce with two men or two women? I just don't think it's right.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Nicknero on November 01, 2012, 06:54:36 AM
God does not e- wait, Im not going to say anything about that. Nor should any of you as religious discussion is not allowed due to drama etc.

My point of view on gay marriage: Its their fucking choice. What does you damn opinion matter on someone elses love life.
Just let them if it makes them happy. They wont hurt anyone.

<::[[ Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S2 using Tapatalk 2 ]]::>
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Jon on November 01, 2012, 07:14:25 AM
I'm just against it because I would like marriage to be reserved specifically for a male and a female. No religious involvement, I just respect tradition and like it this way. A lot of homosexuals tend to ignore this fact and claim it doesn't hurt anyone, every time it's mentioned I get a pain in my chest.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: OwenCobs on November 01, 2012, 07:39:24 AM
Not that I am strongly against it I think the bible teaches that like wakeboarder said you God put you on this Earth to reproduce. Although that isn't strictly true but it's the modern age that has introduced gay marriage it's not something which has been taught which is why it's not looked upon fondly.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: smt on November 01, 2012, 08:19:29 AM
Personally, I am against it. My biology teacher once told me, "God put you on this Earth to reproduce." How can you reproduce with two men or two women? I just don't think it's right.

Since when has marriage been solely about reproducing? Why should a man/figure/object we have no proof of ever existing be the one to say that gay/lesbian people may not marry? The thing that ticks me off is that if God is all loving and all forgiving, why would be be so strict and seem to invoke Christians to almost "hate" same-sex relationships?

But fuck this isn't a religious discussion, your views are your views etc, but yeah I think same sex marriages are fine, they hurt no one and if two people of the same sex wish to marry they should be perfectly allowed and able to do so
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: swag master spiderman on November 01, 2012, 08:23:03 AM
Not that I am strongly against it I think the bible teaches that like wakeboarder said you God put you on this Earth to reproduce. Although that isn't strictly true but it's the modern age that has introduced gay marriage it's not something which has been taught which is why it's not looked upon fondly.

The Bible also allows slavery, including selling your own daughter as a sex slave (Exodus 21:1-11), child abuse (Judges 11:29-40 and Isaiah 13:16), and bashing babies against rocks (Hosea 13:16 & Psalms 137:9).

Just because the Bible teaches something, that doesn't make it right. I'm personally for gay marriage, doesn't hurt anybody.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: The Doctor, RIP Juggernaut on November 01, 2012, 02:29:42 PM
For gay marriage.
The main reasons I hear people opposing it is due to religion, and I respect all religions, but basing laws OFF OF religion/religious views violates the first amendment in the US(Look it up). Love is love, no matter what gender it is.
Tell me, why should your views dictate how others live their lives? Why should you control who other people love?
It doesn't hurt anyone, why should it be illegal if no one is harmed?

Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Dallas on November 01, 2012, 02:41:36 PM
The way I see gay marriage is more of a social hurdle, like the Woman's Right Movements and the Civil Rights Movement, once it's out of the way and we all accept them, the better. It's about damn time we set aside our trivial differences anyway instead of fighting each other over it.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Kevin on November 01, 2012, 03:07:23 PM
I am a religious person, or so I think myself to be (Roman Catholic) and though  the catholic church is against the right to gay marriage, I say they should be able to do whatever the fuck they please. I don't really think being gay is a choice, but I'm not quite sure. In the animal kingdom, humans are not the only homosexual animals. Mammals of all kinds are homosexual, and yet they aren't shunned from their prides/clans/whatevertheymaybewithin, unlike today's society, where if you try to come out of the closet any time before college, you're instantly pushed away, as if every single human of the same sex is just your sex toy. I'm quite sure that I don't want to have intercourse with every single woman I see, so if I see a gay person my age, I think the same thing- chances are they don't want to have sex with me, which is fine because I'm straight.

Even though Christians are taught that gay marriage (Or just BEING gay) is wrong, I was taught that it's still socially acceptable to be gay, and being homosexual can be part of original sin.

I didn't grow up in a gay loving or super modern catholic house. In fact my parents call gay people 'faggots' quite casually, and my sister likes to go up to Portland, where she now lives, and they call it 'Dykeville'

It just gets me heated when my parents act like that, I think everyone is created equally. Thinking otherwise is just fucking ignorant.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: JF on November 01, 2012, 03:17:45 PM
I am a religious person, or so I think myself to be (Roman Catholic) and though  the catholic church is against the right to gay marriage, I say they should be able to do whatever the fuck they please. I don't really think being gay is a choice, but I'm not quite sure. In the animal kingdom, humans are not the only homosexual animals. Mammals of all kinds are homosexual, and yet they aren't shunned from their prides/clans/whatevertheymaybewithin, unlike today's society, where if you try to come out of the closet any time before college, you're instantly pushed away, as if every single human of the same sex is just your sex toy. I'm quite sure that I don't want to have intercourse with every single woman I see, so if I see a gay person my age, I think the same thing- chances are they don't want to have sex with me, which is fine because I'm straight.

Even though Christians are taught that gay marriage (Or just BEING gay) is wrong, I was taught that it's still socially acceptable to be gay, and being homosexual can be part of original sin.

I didn't grow up in a gay loving or super modern catholic house. In fact my parents call gay people 'faggots' quite casually, and my sister likes to go up to Portland, where she now lives, and they call it 'Dykeville'

It just gets me heated when my parents act like that, I think everyone is created equally. Thinking otherwise is just fucking ignorant.
Fucking respect man... I wish every religious person shared your attitude.
Srsly, +1000 respect.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 01, 2012, 03:29:35 PM
I'm religious in the sence I believe in God, but I don't follow many of his  teachings, nor do I take the bible  at  its word about how I should lead  my life. That being said I still hate homosexuals for the sole reason they disgust me, and thus I am against allowing them to marry. Hating them to me is the same as hating a spider is to people, I didn't choose to any more than they chose to be gay, and I could probably change my views if I opened up and exposed myself to more gay people, but I feel no reason to so for the forseable future I oppose gay rights.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: smt on November 01, 2012, 03:32:22 PM
I'm religious in the sence I believe in God, but I don't follow many of his  teachings, nor do I take the bible  at  its word about how I should lead  my life. That being said I still hate homosexuals for the sole reason they disgust me, and thus I am against allowing them to marry. Hating them to me is the same as hating a spider is to people, I didn't choose to any more than they chose to be gay, and I could probably change my views if I opened up and exposed myself to more gay people, but I feel no reason to so for the forseable future I oppose gay rights.

What's the reason, if any? Just interested, what "disgusts" you? Is it the fact another man might be attracted to you, do you hate gay males as much as lesbian females?
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: CrazyNinja on November 01, 2012, 04:09:13 PM
Well, I'm an athiest and.... never mind, going to respect Nicknero's post saying not to cause drama over religion.

Anyways, my opinion on gay marriage is, to be honest I have nothing against it.  I think anyone should be able to choose who they want to spend their entire lives with, who are we to judge them?  Some say, well they aren't born like that and can change, I'm not for certain but maybe they aren't?  Gays can also say the same thing about straight people and be like "Well you weren't born straight, so you should be gay" or so fourth.  Who are we to say other wise?  They can't reproduce, that's true, but who cares?  Marriage isn't about having sex and/or reproducing, well part of it is.  Still though, if two people want to spend their lives with a certain individual, then who are we to say otherwise?  It's retarded in my opinion.  It's a shame that people are still so ignorant about it and turn their heads towards people that like the same sex.  They are still human beings, and it's not like they killed someone or something.  One of the reasons that I don't believe in religion is all the issues and such it causes and how ignorant and such it can make people.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Penguin on November 01, 2012, 04:21:00 PM
I don't agree with gay marriage, just for the pure fact that I think that it isn't natural... The anus is an exit only, lets keep it that way. I have gay friends and all that good stuff, but is this really worth discussing?
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: LG-IM.Swagger on November 01, 2012, 04:28:47 PM
Personally, I am against it. My biology teacher once told me, "God put you on this Earth to reproduce." How can you reproduce with two men or two women? I just don't think it's right.

Your biology teacher is meant to respect the rights of all sexes whether or not.

Frankly, the way society has turned out, it's acceptable, actually, no it was acceptable from the fucking start, wanna know why? It's been scientifically proven that animals have homosexual genes as well, meaning that they would want to mate with the same sex. I find it pretty inhumane to want to stop choice, and bar choice. Frankly, let's think about this (I'm Atheist btw, incoming christian bashing). Christians LOVE to have their own way, soon as they don't get it? NOPE FUCK YOU LALALALA *fingers in ears* They are the pure reason why we aren't 2000 years ahead in technology, why we have not developed even further as a human race and are the main causes of a number of wars (religion in general) This is a huge problem, people are feeling isolated from the world just because their rights are being put into a stranglehold by some faggot with a hat on and a staff. Wanna know something funny? That guy thinks Child Molesting is absolutely fine, fuck that guy, fuck religion, fuck barring rights, and fuck stupid threads like this, we shouldn't have to say whether it's right or wrong, it should just be RIGHT. Simple as, it's in our genetics, we're bi-curious by the time we hit the pubescent stage and that's how nature works, people try out everything, they wonder what it's like and then they notice that they either:

1. Get bored of it and go back to 'normality'.
2. Continue it and notice they enjoy this, change their sexuality.
3. Don't do it and all and put themselves into a closet.

Also, one last thing, fuck the Human Race if they believe this standard is unacceptable, it happens, get a fucking grip.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Dallas on November 01, 2012, 04:36:28 PM
I don't agree with gay marriage, just for the pure fact that I think that it isn't natural... The anus is an exit only, lets keep it that way. I have gay friends and all that good stuff, but is this really worth discussing?

It's the biggest social issue we've seen in decades, yes of course we have to talk about it. People that oppose it seem a little intolerant or unwilling to accept this natural broadening of Human tolerance.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Kevin on November 01, 2012, 05:01:16 PM
I'm religious in the sence I believe in God, but I don't follow many of his  teachings, nor do I take the bible  at  its word about how I should lead  my life. That being said I still hate homosexuals for the sole reason they disgust me, and thus I am against allowing them to marry. Hating them to me is the same as hating a spider is to people, I didn't choose to any more than they chose to be gay, and I could probably change my views if I opened up and exposed myself to more gay people, but I feel no reason to so for the forseable future I oppose gay rights.

What's the reason, if any? Just interested, what "disgusts" you? Is it the fact another man might be attracted to you, do you hate gay males as much as lesbian females?

That's the thing, though. Whenever I ask my parents why they dislike gays, their only reason is "Because they're fucking faggots." Or in more cases, "Because they're fucking dykes."

It's stupid. People grow up hating gays, they don't know why, it was just etched into them, probably because of their parents. I remember I used to complain about gay people to my dad JUST BECAUSE HE INSTILLED IT INTO ME. Unless a roving gang of homosexuals broke into your house and killed your family... I don't really see any logical explanation as to why we should hate gays.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: alaskan thunderfuck on November 01, 2012, 05:01:57 PM
I see absolutely no reason as to why people care what others do. Compare this to something like smoking, who gives a fuck what people do to themselves? People aren't likely to run up to you and blow smoke down your throat, just like gay people aren't likely to run in to your bedroom and start fucking on the floor. Stop giving a fuck what other people do in their free time.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: smt on November 01, 2012, 05:03:00 PM
I'm religious in the sence I believe in God, but I don't follow many of his  teachings, nor do I take the bible  at  its word about how I should lead  my life. That being said I still hate homosexuals for the sole reason they disgust me, and thus I am against allowing them to marry. Hating them to me is the same as hating a spider is to people, I didn't choose to any more than they chose to be gay, and I could probably change my views if I opened up and exposed myself to more gay people, but I feel no reason to so for the forseable future I oppose gay rights.

What's the reason, if any? Just interested, what "disgusts" you? Is it the fact another man might be attracted to you, do you hate gay males as much as lesbian females?

That's the thing, though. Whenever I ask my parents why they dislike gays, their only reason is "Because they're fucking faggots." Or in more cases, "Because they're fucking dykes."

It's stupid. People grow up hating gays, they don't know why, it was just etched into them, probably because of their parents. I remember I used to complain about gay people to my dad JUST BECAUSE HE INSTILLED IT INTO ME. Unless a roving gang of homosexuals broke into your house and killed your family... I don't really see any logical explanation as to why we should hate gays.

Though I know you're just making a point, the fact a roving gang of homosexuals broke into your house and killed your family would still more than likely have nothing to do with their sexuality, unless they happened to only do this because they were homosexual and hated straight people or something, just saying :V
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Kevin on November 01, 2012, 05:03:36 PM
I see absolutely no reason as to why people care what others do. Compare this to something like smoking, who gives a fuck what people do to themselves? People aren't likely to run up to you and blow smoke down your throat, just like gay people aren't likely to run in to your bedroom and start fucking on the floor. Stop giving a fuck what other people do in their free time.

I... fucking... died.

Post Auto-Merged: November 01, 2012, 05:05:53 PM
Personally, I am against it. My biology teacher once told me, "God put you on this Earth to reproduce." How can you reproduce with two men or two women? I just don't think it's right.

Your biology teacher is meant to respect the rights of all sexes whether or not.

Frankly, the way society has turned out, it's acceptable, actually, no it was acceptable from the fucking start, wanna know why? It's been scientifically proven that animals have homosexual genes as well, meaning that they would want to mate with the same sex. I find it pretty inhumane to want to stop choice, and bar choice. Frankly, let's think about this (I'm Atheist btw, incoming christian bashing). Christians LOVE to have their own way, soon as they don't get it? NOPE FUCK YOU LALALALA *fingers in ears* They are the pure reason why we aren't 2000 years ahead in technology, why we have not developed even further as a human race and are the main causes of a number of wars (religion in general) This is a huge problem, people are feeling isolated from the world just because their rights are being put into a stranglehold by some faggot with a hat on and a staff. Wanna know something funny? That guy thinks Child Molesting is absolutely fine, fuck that guy, fuck religion, fuck barring rights, and fuck stupid threads like this, we shouldn't have to say whether it's right or wrong, it should just be RIGHT. Simple as, it's in our genetics, we're bi-curious by the time we hit the pubescent stage and that's how nature works, people try out everything, they wonder what it's like and then they notice that they either:

1. Get bored of it and go back to 'normality'.
2. Continue it and notice they enjoy this, change their sexuality.
3. Don't do it and all and put themselves into a closet.

Also, one last thing, fuck the Human Race if they believe this standard is unacceptable, it happens, get a fucking grip.

Eh... and untrue. Sweeping generalization right there. I don't really jam my beliefs down anyone's throat or run away when people disagree with me. Most christians would, but... just try not to generalize.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: That Guy ?-? on November 01, 2012, 05:09:42 PM
My response:
(http://i.imgur.com/wALQa.jpg)
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: tics on November 01, 2012, 05:50:34 PM
I don't agree with gay marriage, just for the pure fact that I think that it isn't natural... The anus is an exit only, lets keep it that way. I have gay friends and all that good stuff, but is this really worth discussing?
Because marriage is all about sex right? Oh wait, it isn't.

I'd imagine that all of you can probably guess where I stand on the issue, so here's a few things.

Homosexuality not natural? Heh...heh...heh
Is that why it's been observed in black swans, gulls, ibises, mallards, penguins, vultures, pigeons, Amazon dolphins, American bison, bonobos (among other apes, as well), bottlenose dolphins, elephants, giraffes, monkeys, Japanese macaques, lions, polecats, sheep, spotted hyenas, and various lizards and insects?

The "unnatural" argument against homosexuality and gay marriage is about as baseless as the "you choose to be gay" argument. I didn't wake up one morning and choose to be gay. 
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: [LP]GMK-MRL on November 01, 2012, 06:59:05 PM
As a moderate liberal, I have no problems when Gays get married, I don't see how it would hurt you other than making someone uncomfortable when they think about a Gay person's sex life in marriage. Some people never have Sex as Gays when they get Married and that's one of the things people do not realize.


But I do slightly go against it....since if I even go to a place with a gay dude beside me I get this random number on my phone with some dude saying they like me....shit gets annoying.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: smt on November 01, 2012, 07:55:04 PM
As a moderate liberal, I have no problems when Gays get married, I don't see how it would hurt you other than making someone uncomfortable when they think about a Gay person's sex life in marriage. Some people never have Sex as Gays when they get Married and that's one of the things people do not realize.


But I do slightly go against it....since if I even go to a place with a gay dude beside me I get this random number on my phone with some dude saying they like me....shit gets annoying.

@Spoiler tags
To me, that sounds fine, you dislike a gay guy trying to hit on you, I'd dislike that too as I'm straight, I imagine if I was gay I'd dislike females trying to hit on me, I don't think that's wrong at all, it's not "hating" homosexuals, it's hating being hit on lol
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Pielolz on November 01, 2012, 08:05:13 PM
^ respect

I am glad to see others opinions on the sensitive matter, though it pains me that we cannot get pass our differences.


What two dudes do in the bedroom is none of our business, it is there personal love life. They do not care about yours, so why hate on theirs?

I get that a straight dude is repulsed at the scene of two dudes fucking, which is fine, you're not gay, so you don't like seeing gay sex. They probly hate straight sex etc.


But why hate? Hatred is that to be reserved for killers and your enemies; but an innocent man/woman whom likes their same sex? Why?

If it leaves a bad taste in your mouth, then don't think about it, or look away. But for god's sake, don't completely steal some one's right to love because of your skewed morals.


On the subject of religion, separation of Church and state. + God hates no one, and loves all, and made us all equal (Yes, you are infact the complete equal to a gay man!)
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: smt on November 01, 2012, 08:11:18 PM
Another thing related to homosexuality, I love all the "eww gay guys!!" reactions but most of the same people are totally happy to watch lesbians in a porn, that's just spectacular and almost ironic really, can't stand the sight of two gay guys and doesn't feel that they should love or marry yet gets off on the sight of two lesbian girls and thinks that is a great thing, lol, always amused me that little thing
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: [LP]GMK-MRL on November 01, 2012, 08:17:47 PM
My response:
(http://i.imgur.com/wALQa.jpg)

For the "Families Destroyed" part, they made a movie about that called Brokeback Moutain. It relates to this because the family wasn't destroyed because of gay marriage, but it was because of the pure hate that followed.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: LG-IM.Swagger on November 01, 2012, 08:21:04 PM
I'd be flattered if a gay hit on me. :D
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Sexy Frog on November 01, 2012, 08:23:32 PM
In my honest opinion, I have no problems with it at all. I live by the philosophy that "If it doesn't hurt anybody, why care?" I think homosexuals can run around getting married, adopting children, having orgies on horses; the whole shebang. Why would anyone concern themselves with something so fucking insignificant as two people loving each other, even if they are the same sex, is it REALLY so different as the love between a man and a woman? Sure, the biological reproduction isn't there but why does that matter?

Like someone said, humans aren't the only homosexual organisms in the animal kingdom. Dolphins are a prime examples. Dolphins are led on to be one of the most intelligent animals on the face of this planet and let me tell you, if you think they aren't fudge packing their fellow aquatic mammal friends, you are sadly mistaken. Long story short, I have better things to think about than some guy/girl wanting to get hitched to another guy/girl that they love as strongly as John from down the street loves Sally.

Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: [LP]GMK-MRL on November 01, 2012, 08:29:17 PM
I'd be flattered if a gay hit on me.

I was at first, but then he turned into a stalker and....you know that aint fun.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Lone Wanderer on November 02, 2012, 01:34:59 AM
I'm a religious person as well, and althougth I'm not going to get into a huge debate about this, or go to deep into why I feel this way, I am personally against gay marriage. I feel that marriage is to be between a man and a woman, partially because of the Bible, partially because of tradition, and partially because that's just the way I like to view to topic. That's what I've been taught growing up, and I still think that way now. Do I think that people should be able to do what they want, however? In some respects, yes. This case would be one of them. If people really want to do something like that, am I going to go raging about it and the like? No, of course not. I'm not going to like it, but I'm going to respect that choice.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: cookiesofamerica on November 02, 2012, 06:01:29 PM
In my opinion, every human being's mind is perverted one way to another (this doesn't mean it's bad) When we have an sexual attraction to someone (or something) Is uh.. shit let me just give an example: If  male 1 is attracted to  male 2 because of let's say we call this attraction:A. In male's 1 mind is attracted by people with A, and let's say this attraction would be Male only, then in this case Male 1 would be attracted to Male 2. It's the same thing with Male being attracted to Female. (I think i made it more confusing but w/e)

I don't agree with Homosexuality but that doesn't it should be against the law, because it's a person's choice. As human beings our minds are perverted but some minds are more than others.

Now for the "Oh we were born that way." Is bullshit. If that were the case human beings would be able to produce no matter what the sex was. For example: Since Pedophilia is an sexual attraction (and an disorder) then why are they arrested if doctors considered this as a disorder? Wouldn't there be ways of keeping it to a minimum? Like autism for example, if we see symptoms at the first signs like: Unable to speak (My brother has autism and he couldn't speak until a the age of 4.), sameness, stacking. Then It can be treated with mental help. But it's an sexual attraction, so it would be the same thing as my example, it can be the same thing with other crimes that let's say Person A was going to rob Person B, this is a thought created by Person A because of something Person B owns.

TL;DR: All Sexual orientations and fetishes are all in perspective of one's mind, in this case we are all bisexuals.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: smt on November 02, 2012, 06:06:31 PM
In my opinion, every human being's mind is perverted one way to another (this doesn't mean it's bad) When we have an sexual attraction to someone (or something) Is uh.. shit let me just give an example: If  male 1 is attracted to  male 2 because of let's say we call this attraction:A. In male's 1 mind is attracted by people with A, and let's say this attraction would be Male only, then in this case Male 1 would be attracted to Male 2. It's the same thing with Male being attracted to Female. (I think i made it more confusing but w/e)

I don't agree with Homosexuality but that doesn't it should be against the law, because it's a person's choice. As human beings our minds are perverted but some minds are more than others.

Now for the "Oh we were born that way." Is bullshit. If that were the case human beings would be able to produce no matter what the sex was. For example: Since Pedophilia is an sexual attraction (and an disorder) then why are they arrested if doctors considered this as a disorder? Wouldn't there be ways of keeping it to a minimum? Like autism for example, if we see symptoms at the first signs like: Unable to speak (My brother has autism and he couldn't speak until a the age of 4.), sameness, stacking. Then It can be treated with mental help. But it's an sexual attraction, so it would be the same thing as my example, it can be the same thing with other crimes that let's say Person A was going to rob Person B, this is a thought created by Person A because of something Person B owns.

You make it sound like homosexuality is a disorder yet at the same time you make it sound like people have the choice of being gay or not, did you have the choice of being straight or not?

Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: cookiesofamerica on November 02, 2012, 06:13:45 PM
In my opinion, every human being's mind is perverted one way to another (this doesn't mean it's bad) When we have an sexual attraction to someone (or something) Is uh.. shit let me just give an example: If  male 1 is attracted to  male 2 because of let's say we call this attraction:A. In male's 1 mind is attracted by people with A, and let's say this attraction would be Male only, then in this case Male 1 would be attracted to Male 2. It's the same thing with Male being attracted to Female. (I think i made it more confusing but w/e)

I don't agree with Homosexuality but that doesn't it should be against the law, because it's a person's choice. As human beings our minds are perverted but some minds are more than others.

Now for the "Oh we were born that way." Is bullshit. If that were the case human beings would be able to produce no matter what the sex was. For example: Since Pedophilia is an sexual attraction (and an disorder) then why are they arrested if doctors considered this as a disorder? Wouldn't there be ways of keeping it to a minimum? Like autism for example, if we see symptoms at the first signs like: Unable to speak (My brother has autism and he couldn't speak until a the age of 4.), sameness, stacking. Then It can be treated with mental help. But it's an sexual attraction, so it would be the same thing as my example, it can be the same thing with other crimes that let's say Person A was going to rob Person B, this is a thought created by Person A because of something Person B owns.

You make it sound like homosexuality is a disorder yet at the same time you make it sound like people have the choice of being gay or not, did you have the choice of being straight or not?



It is a choice, but I'm putting two opinions into one basically what I said about Homosexuality being disorder is if it was that: Then we can fix the symptoms and mentally get rid of the disorder.

However, this is not the case: It is one's perspective on their sexual orientation. In my opinion we are born as bisexual (which is our first subconscious thought), then through our  subconscious we decide what sexual orientation one wants to have through experiences of our lives.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: rBST Cow on November 02, 2012, 06:14:45 PM
Why does anyone care what someone else does. Saying you shouldn't get married to another man because the bible says so or it's "unnatural" it's not ok is the most ignorant thing you could ever say. I don't care if someone is gay or not, because they are not affecting my life in a negative way.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Delta1116732 on November 02, 2012, 06:30:06 PM
Personally I think that people are able to choose whatever they want. As long as it makes them happy, and good in life then fine by me.  Though I don't understand why some people are so against it. I don't see a problem, and there is probably a few people that love the same sex in CG. Ironically reading this topic. Never the less I think it's fine for someone to follow what they believe in. Religion, sex preference anything like that is good in my eyes. Now to await people who disagree. *Delta1116732 sits back in it seat with a newspaper awaiting the comments.*
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 02, 2012, 06:40:18 PM
I'm religious in the sence I believe in God, but I don't follow many of his  teachings, nor do I take the bible  at  its word about how I should lead  my life. That being said I still hate homosexuals for the sole reason they disgust me, and thus I am against allowing them to marry. Hating them to me is the same as hating a spider is to people, I didn't choose to any more than they chose to be gay, and I could probably change my views if I opened up and exposed myself to more gay people, but I feel no reason to so for the forseable future I oppose gay rights.

What's the reason, if any? Just interested, what "disgusts" you? Is it the fact another man might be attracted to you, do you hate gay males as much as lesbian females?

That's the thing, though. Whenever I ask my parents why they dislike gays, their only reason is "Because they're fucking faggots." Or in more cases, "Because they're fucking dykes."

It's stupid. People grow up hating gays, they don't know why, it was just etched into them, probably because of their parents. I remember I used to complain about gay people to my dad JUST BECAUSE HE INSTILLED IT INTO ME. Unless a roving gang of homosexuals broke into your house and killed your family... I don't really see any logical explanation as to why we should hate gays.

Though I know you're just making a point, the fact a roving gang of homosexuals broke into your house and killed your family would still more than likely have nothing to do with their sexuality, unless they happened to only do this because they were homosexual and hated straight people or something, just saying :V

Sorry so many comments apeared before I responded. The fact a man might be attracted to me does disgust me, but just the idea of two of the same sex having an attraction towards eachother is disgusting and makes me shudder. And yes that applies to lesbians as well. I am of the opinion that homosexuality is a disorder and embracing it is stupid in my opinion. And for anyone who might say it isn't because animals can also be homosexual, animals can also be retarded or have stillborns, but that doesn't make it good.

But why hate? Hatred is that to be reserved for killers and your enemies; but an innocent man/woman whom likes their same sex? Why?

If it leaves a bad taste in your mouth, then don't think about it, or look away. But for god's sake, don't completely steal some one's right to love because of your skewed morals.


On the subject of religion, separation of Church and state. + God hates no one, and loves all, and made us all equal (Yes, you are infact the complete equal to a gay man!)

It all depends on what you mean by hate but I don't hate  killers and neither do a lot of people, after all military men are "killers". Hate is like beauty, its in the eye of the beholder. Something that might mean nothing to  one person may make another completly loathe you, so I don't see why homosexuality would be an exception. I also don't approve of you saying scewed morals as you can't really impose your morals  on us and say you're right and we are wrong. Finally, on the Church, just like everyone else here not gonna start a big thing about whether Christianity  is right or not, but gonna adress those  points. Marriage takes place in a Church, or a Mosque or another religious place, performed by a preacher. Thus seperation of Church and state does not apply  here as this legislation would directly affect religion, and thus they must have a say. While God hates no one he also recognizes evil  in people and destroys them, thus the line about him being a vengeful God, so if the Christians believe God thinks gays are evil, there is justification in that. Finally, God created all men equal, but the origional man was straight, I believe the line all the religious nuts use is "God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve."
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: alaskan thunderfuck on November 02, 2012, 06:52:41 PM
In my opinion, every human being's mind is perverted one way to another (this doesn't mean it's bad) When we have an sexual attraction to someone (or something) Is uh.. shit let me just give an example: If  male 1 is attracted to  male 2 because of let's say we call this attraction:A. In male's 1 mind is attracted by people with A, and let's say this attraction would be Male only, then in this case Male 1 would be attracted to Male 2. It's the same thing with Male being attracted to Female. (I think i made it more confusing but w/e)

I don't agree with Homosexuality but that doesn't it should be against the law, because it's a person's choice. As human beings our minds are perverted but some minds are more than others.

Now for the "Oh we were born that way." Is bullshit. If that were the case human beings would be able to produce no matter what the sex was. For example: Since Pedophilia is an sexual attraction (and an disorder) then why are they arrested if doctors considered this as a disorder? Wouldn't there be ways of keeping it to a minimum? Like autism for example, if we see symptoms at the first signs like: Unable to speak (My brother has autism and he couldn't speak until a the age of 4.), sameness, stacking. Then It can be treated with mental help. But it's an sexual attraction, so it would be the same thing as my example, it can be the same thing with other crimes that let's say Person A was going to rob Person B, this is a thought created by Person A because of something Person B owns.

TL;DR: All Sexual orientations and fetishes are all in perspective of one's mind, in this case we are all bisexuals.
How could it not be a choice? I couldn't bring myself to like dick in my ass and I'm sure a gay guy would find vagina repulsive. It's not like people wake up one day and think "I WANT TO GET FUCKED IN THE ASS BY 30 MEN AT THE SAME TIME"
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Lone Wanderer on November 02, 2012, 07:24:03 PM
Why does anyone care what someone else does. Saying you shouldn't get married to another man because the bible says so or it's "unnatural" it's not ok is the most ignorant thing you could ever say. I don't care if someone is gay or not, because they are not affecting my life in a negative way.

It kind of does affect some people. Some people have a philosophical problem with it, and if two gay people were toa ctually be married, then it clearly would make them a little bit upset in that regard. Just because it doesn't physically affect you, doesn't mean it doesn't affect others in a mental/emotional manner. Emotional and mental problems are just as important as physical ones. So don't go that we're ignorant just because 'the Bible says so' or 'it's unnatural'. We feel that way, and that's how we percieve the situation. It really offends me that you said that, because from my point of view, I've taken careful consideration as to why I feel the way I do on the topic. I've considered my religion, my personal feelings, the feelings/teachings of my family and teachers throughout my life. I've also considered things like today's politics and culture, along with that of the past to some extent. I've also tried looking at it from the other point of view, from a pro-gay marriage side of things. That doesn'y make me, nor the other people who've stated their beliefs similar to me, ignornant.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Pielolz on November 02, 2012, 07:33:58 PM
smt, rofl, thank you.

but to the haters, why can't a man spend his life with some one he loves? You claim emotions now, then respect other people's.

A choice? LOL, you don't get out of the shower, dry off, look in the mirror, then said "Dick sounds appetizing." No, it's more like "Huh, susy is nice, but John makes me blush and turn my head when he approaches. Gosh, I can't think why." At 5

Denying some one's right to the pursuit of happiness is in direct violation of the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land.


Also, god made everyone PERFECT in HIS IMAGE. So you insult God.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 02, 2012, 07:54:23 PM
smt, rofl, thank you.

but to the haters, why can't a man spend his life with some one he loves? You claim emotions now, then respect other people's.

A choice? LOL, you don't get out of the shower, dry off, look in the mirror, then said "Dick sounds appetizing." No, it's more like "Huh, susy is nice, but John makes me blush and turn my head when he approaches. Gosh, I can't think why." At 5

Denying some one's right to the pursuit of happiness is in direct violation of the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land.


Also, god made everyone PERFECT in HIS IMAGE. So you insult God.

Two things wrong with your persuit of happiness thing. One is you don't need a gay lover to be happy, and more importantly that only applies if getting your persuit of happiness doesn't infringe on others, if someone gets off on serial murder we don't allow it even though it might deny him the right. Even if allowing gay marriage wouldn't make countless people unhappy, there is still the issue that you can't force churches to allow gays to be married.

God made man in his image, meaning the fact that we look the way we do is because of him, like the arms and legs deal. However our psyche is completly different so unless I'm saying that arms are ugly and people who have them are bad, I'm not saying anything against God.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: The Doctor, RIP Juggernaut on November 02, 2012, 09:01:50 PM
smt, rofl, thank you.

but to the haters, why can't a man spend his life with some one he loves? You claim emotions now, then respect other people's.

A choice? LOL, you don't get out of the shower, dry off, look in the mirror, then said "Dick sounds appetizing." No, it's more like "Huh, susy is nice, but John makes me blush and turn my head when he approaches. Gosh, I can't think why." At 5

Denying some one's right to the pursuit of happiness is in direct violation of the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land.


Also, god made everyone PERFECT in HIS IMAGE. So you insult God.

Two things wrong with your persuit of happiness thing. One is you don't need a gay lover to be happy, and more importantly that only applies if getting your persuit of happiness doesn't infringe on others, if someone gets off on serial murder we don't allow it even though it might deny him the right. Even if allowing gay marriage wouldn't make countless people unhappy, there is still the issue that you can't force churches to allow gays to be married.

God made man in his image, meaning the fact that we look the way we do is because of him, like the arms and legs deal. However our psyche is completly different so unless I'm saying that arms are ugly and people who have them are bad, I'm not saying anything against God.
No one ever said that we'd be forcing churches to allow it, but the government would recognize gay unions as proper marriage.

Now, comparing gay people to murderers? REALLY?  REALLY?
You should slap your self for doing that. Gay people ARE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE SPECTRUM AS MURDERERS, they don't want to cause arm, only to love the people THEY love, and have protection from the government. Comparing them to murderers is going WAY, WAY, WAY, too far.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: smt on November 02, 2012, 09:10:30 PM
Call me out if I'm wrong but from what I'm seeing the religious people or people who have had religious upbringings seem to disagree. To me this seems bad, I respect anyone's religious believes but should these beliefs be used to stop and fight against two ordinary people from loving one another?
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 02, 2012, 09:47:17 PM
No one ever said that we'd be forcing churches to allow it, but the government would recognize gay unions as proper marriage.

Now, comparing gay people to murderers? REALLY?  REALLY?
You should slap your self for doing that. Gay people ARE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE SPECTRUM AS MURDERERS, they don't want to cause arm, only to love the people THEY love, and have protection from the government. Comparing them to murderers is going WAY, WAY, WAY, too far.

Get married outside fo the church? I still find it disgusting but I'm sure more people would accept it if that happened.

And are you seriously saying gay people can't be murderers? That all gay people just want to love and be marry? You're either idealistic  or a fool, although I consider those practically the same thing. That asside, I was simply using murderers as an example of how your persuit of happiness can be overridden if it stomps on others. Want other examples then? Drunk driving, marajuana, public nudity, you name it.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: garry :D on November 02, 2012, 09:49:49 PM
What if a gay couple has no intention to have sex? Would it still be 'disgusting'?
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Anzu on November 02, 2012, 09:55:33 PM
No one ever said that we'd be forcing churches to allow it, but the government would recognize gay unions as proper marriage.

Now, comparing gay people to murderers? REALLY?  REALLY?
You should slap your self for doing that. Gay people ARE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE SPECTRUM AS MURDERERS, they don't want to cause arm, only to love the people THEY love, and have protection from the government. Comparing them to murderers is going WAY, WAY, WAY, too far.

Get married outside fo the church? I still find it disgusting but I'm sure more people would accept it if that happened.

And are you seriously saying gay people can't be murderers? That all gay people just want to love and be marry? You're either idealistic  or a fool, although I consider those practically the same thing. That asside, I was simply using murderers as an example of how your persuit of happiness can be overridden if it stomps on others. Want other examples then? Drunk driving, marajuana, public nudity, you name it.

Straight people and Christians are capable of all this you mentioned aswell
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: The Doctor, RIP Juggernaut on November 02, 2012, 10:12:44 PM
They're not even frickin' close, one causes harm to other people, the other just wants the ability to legally wed.
Tell me, why should two people not be allowed to marry just because it disgust you?
They're not fucking flashing, they're not smoking pot, and they're not driving drunk, THEY ARE GETTING MARRIED stop trying to put MARRIAGE together with violent crimes, ANYONE can commit those crimes, just because they're gay doesn't make them more likely.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Kevin on November 02, 2012, 10:17:09 PM
Call me out if I'm wrong but from what I'm seeing the religious people or people who have had religious upbringings seem to disagree. To me this seems bad, I respect anyone's religious believes but should these beliefs be used to stop and fight against two ordinary people from loving one another?

It wasn't really the church that taught my parents and I that homosexuality and them marrying is wrong, in fact it's never brought up in church, it's just that my parents both grew up with the values instilled in them that "Dykes and faggots are the worst of the worst." Or so it seems.

I myself, though being catholic, don't like the view that homosexuality is wrong. I mean, I'm not comfortable thinking about cocks all day long, but hey, I don't think gay men like thinking about tits and vaginas all day long, which is fair.

Being homosexual is observed in dozens of other species, and thus it is COMPLETELY natural.

As for you, GamingZealot, stop being an ignorant ass.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Howard Biggs on November 02, 2012, 10:21:28 PM
I agree with same sex marriage, but you do not have to be gay to have marriage, such as Bisexuality and Bromance. But one man and another or women love each other that is not wrong, people able to order what people can and can't do is Orwellian and should not be stood upon. I myself do not care for sexuality, but I do believe that if you were to marry someone in your own gender than that is fine, but when people say it is not is what makes me angry, as people have a right to chose who they want to marry.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 02, 2012, 10:28:49 PM
They're not even frickin' close, one causes harm to other people, the other just wants the ability to legally wed.
Tell me, why should two people not be allowed to marry just because it disgust you?
They're not fucking flashing, they're not smoking pot, and they're not driving drunk, THEY ARE GETTING MARRIED stop trying to put MARRIAGE together with violent crimes, ANYONE can commit those crimes, just because they're gay doesn't make them more likely.

You're either incredibly dense or a kid, can't tell which. I never said the level of crime was the same, just pointing out the precident. Just because its not on the same level as murder doesn't mean the rules don't apply to it. If you read my comment at all you would know I never said the two were the same. I said I was against same sex marriage because it disgusts me, that's my opinion. Anyone CAN commit those crimes and being gay doesn't increase the chance at all, what I was pointing out is in an earlier argument you implied that every gay person was benign and free from crime, which isn't true. Finally, if you reply once again saying I'm trying to lump marriage in with violent crimes I won't waste the words replying to you. I am merely using examples to point out rules.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Kevin on November 02, 2012, 10:32:16 PM
They're not even frickin' close, one causes harm to other people, the other just wants the ability to legally wed.
Tell me, why should two people not be allowed to marry just because it disgust you?
They're not fucking flashing, they're not smoking pot, and they're not driving drunk, THEY ARE GETTING MARRIED stop trying to put MARRIAGE together with violent crimes, ANYONE can commit those crimes, just because they're gay doesn't make them more likely.

You're either incredibly dense or a kid, can't tell which. I never said the level of crime was the same, just pointing out the precident. Just because its not on the same level as murder doesn't mean the rules don't apply to it. If you read my comment at all you would know I never said the two were the same. I said I was against same sex marriage because it disgusts me, that's my opinion. Anyone CAN commit those crimes and being gay doesn't increase the chance at all, what I was pointing out is in an earlier argument you implied that every gay person was benign and free from crime, which isn't true. Finally, if you reply once again saying I'm trying to lump marriage in with violent crimes I won't waste the words replying to you. I am merely using examples to point out rules.

What exactly do you mean by rules?
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Kevin on November 02, 2012, 10:55:53 PM
I'm against marriage in general.

Marriage should be stricken completely from the government. By having marriage in the government, we bring religion into the government.

The government version of marriage, should be called a Civil Union, weather you're gay, straight, bi, whatever/

If you want to be married, you do it through your church, not through the government.

So no, I'm not against gay marriage because in certain religions, gays aren't stricken from being married

I am; however, against forcing Catholic churches to marry gay people because that would be forcing your religion down their throat.

All in all, Government = Civil Union, Religion = Marriage/Whatever the fuck your religion calls it.

I really should be a politician.

You're listening to the wrong catholics man. All anyone ever says is that we jam our religion down people's throats. Stop listening to the "BECOME A CHRISTIAN OR BURN IN HELL" guys and start listening to the EDUCATED CHRISTIANS. But all in all, I can respect that idea. I myself don't quite agree with it, but I sense some sort of good logic in it.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: cookiesofamerica on November 02, 2012, 11:26:21 PM
In my opinion, every human being's mind is perverted one way to another (this doesn't mean it's bad) When we have an sexual attraction to someone (or something) Is uh.. shit let me just give an example: If  male 1 is attracted to  male 2 because of let's say we call this attraction:A. In male's 1 mind is attracted by people with A, and let's say this attraction would be Male only, then in this case Male 1 would be attracted to Male 2. It's the same thing with Male being attracted to Female. (I think i made it more confusing but w/e)

I don't agree with Homosexuality but that doesn't it should be against the law, because it's a person's choice. As human beings our minds are perverted but some minds are more than others.

Now for the "Oh we were born that way." Is bullshit. If that were the case human beings would be able to produce no matter what the sex was. For example: Since Pedophilia is an sexual attraction (and an disorder) then why are they arrested if doctors considered this as a disorder? Wouldn't there be ways of keeping it to a minimum? Like autism for example, if we see symptoms at the first signs like: Unable to speak (My brother has autism and he couldn't speak until a the age of 4.), sameness, stacking. Then It can be treated with mental help. But it's an sexual attraction, so it would be the same thing as my example, it can be the same thing with other crimes that let's say Person A was going to rob Person B, this is a thought created by Person A because of something Person B owns.

TL;DR: All Sexual orientations and fetishes are all in perspective of one's mind, in this case we are all bisexuals.
How could it not be a choice? I couldn't bring myself to like dick in my ass and I'm sure a gay guy would find vagina repulsive. It's not like people wake up one day and think "I WANT TO GET FUCKED IN THE ASS BY 30 MEN AT THE SAME TIME"

If that wasn't sarcasm I would say this(And that assumption was right, then well shit.):

Summary

Sexual orientation isn't through a conscious process it's subconscious. For whatever was the sexual attraction for the sexual orientation to form. (Homo/hetero/bisexual it all outcomes as so) I suppose my robber theory was exaggerated because sexual orientation takes one's mind experience for a long amount of time (It probably can take at least 14 or more years or so (some longer than others) to develop but to let's say a church reconverts that it takes longer because the subconscious has how you say a similar symptom of autism:Sameness). Another reason for people to change there sexual orientation is through experience of let's say An unnamed Male sexual attraction to other males because maybe the experience of females were negative or has witnessed.

Look at this video for example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jg9cz11SJlU

As you can see this male had to deal with a negative effect of the opposite gender, The unnamed male might think that: "Well if this is what women are maybe I should have a different sexual orientation, where I might not have to deal with this." This problem could be solved through a subconscious process as to choose a different sexual orientation or not to. It's in this case their "choice" whether to choose to stay with their current sexual orientation or change.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Kevin on November 02, 2012, 11:57:41 PM
In my opinion, every human being's mind is perverted one way to another (this doesn't mean it's bad) When we have an sexual attraction to someone (or something) Is uh.. shit let me just give an example: If  male 1 is attracted to  male 2 because of let's say we call this attraction:A. In male's 1 mind is attracted by people with A, and let's say this attraction would be Male only, then in this case Male 1 would be attracted to Male 2. It's the same thing with Male being attracted to Female. (I think i made it more confusing but w/e)

I don't agree with Homosexuality but that doesn't it should be against the law, because it's a person's choice. As human beings our minds are perverted but some minds are more than others.

Now for the "Oh we were born that way." Is bullshit. If that were the case human beings would be able to produce no matter what the sex was. For example: Since Pedophilia is an sexual attraction (and an disorder) then why are they arrested if doctors considered this as a disorder? Wouldn't there be ways of keeping it to a minimum? Like autism for example, if we see symptoms at the first signs like: Unable to speak (My brother has autism and he couldn't speak until a the age of 4.), sameness, stacking. Then It can be treated with mental help. But it's an sexual attraction, so it would be the same thing as my example, it can be the same thing with other crimes that let's say Person A was going to rob Person B, this is a thought created by Person A because of something Person B owns.

TL;DR: All Sexual orientations and fetishes are all in perspective of one's mind, in this case we are all bisexuals.
How could it not be a choice? I couldn't bring myself to like dick in my ass and I'm sure a gay guy would find vagina repulsive. It's not like people wake up one day and think "I WANT TO GET FUCKED IN THE ASS BY 30 MEN AT THE SAME TIME"

If that wasn't sarcasm I would say this(And that assumption was right, then well shit.):

Summary

Sexual orientation isn't through a conscious process it's subconscious. For whatever was the sexual attraction for the sexual orientation to form. (Homo/hetero/bisexual it all outcomes as so) I suppose my robber theory was exaggerated because sexual orientation takes one's mind experience for a long amount of time (It probably can take at least 14 or more years or so (some longer than others) to develop but to let's say a church reconverts that it takes longer because the subconscious has how you say a similar symptom of autism:Sameness). Another reason for people to change there sexual orientation is through experience of let's say An unnamed Male sexual attraction to other males because maybe the experience of females were negative or has witnessed.

Look at this video for example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jg9cz11SJlU


As you can see this male had to deal with a negative effect of the opposite gender, The unnamed male might think that: "Well if this is what women are maybe I should have a different sexual orientation, where I might not have to deal with this." This problem could be solved through a subconscious process as to choose a different sexual orientation or not to. It's in this case their "choice" whether to choose to stay with their current sexual orientation or change.

I suppose that means a male lion, who can have as many sexual partners as he wants, figures it makes more sense to have intercourse with another male lion all of a sudden? No. It's genes, occurrences in the brain that as a fetus, were abnormal and caused them to have reverse sexual orientation. Hardly a choice, unless they were a closet homosexual who decided to come out after some time.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Frolie [Jellykid] on November 03, 2012, 12:02:05 AM
I've got no opinion concerning gay marriage. I understand where conservatives are coming from, with the traditional angle, and can definitely understand why it would make some individuals uncomfortable. However, the fact that equal rights aren't available for people of any difference exists as segregation, and segregation makes it difficult for different peoples to accept themselves, especially in the case of homosexual men and the 'coming out' process. And although gay marriage is in fact legal in several states (California, Massachusetts, New York, etc.), tax amendments still don't apply to legally married same sex couples.

I guess what I'm trying to say is, it's a complicated issue, and there's much more important stuff to deal with. In an ideal world where we could all accept each other's differences without hate, gay marriage would be great, but society simply isn't there yet. Besides, there's more important stuff to tackle.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: YankeeSamurai on November 03, 2012, 02:14:36 AM
God dammit our values are at stake here, and what of tradition!? I feel sick to my stomach every time I see a woman wearing pants and voting, and don't even get me started about those damned black people mingling with us good wholesome white folk! They should just STOP IT and quit being so inconsiderate, can't they see their lives upset me? I've been taught since childhood that these things that are bad, and it makes me nauseous every time I see this bullshit!

My children deserve to live in a place where good ole morality reigns supreme! By golly, them black people just aren't like us! Why can't they leave us alone and eat in their own restaurants and swim in their own swimming pools, huh?

And the nerve of women these days, cutting their hair shorter and all... such immoral choices. Women ought to know their place in society, it says so right in the Bible! If we continue to tolerate these lifestyles of sin, it will be the downfall of America.

Our very way of life is in danger! Say NO to gender equality! Say NO to racial equality!



...wait a second...
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Elions on November 03, 2012, 02:52:45 AM
Leaving religion aside in it's entirety considering this is mlre of a legal issue, there is no logical reason to ban homosexual marriage. You do not have to agree with it, but it should be entirely legal for two conscenting adults to marry, whatever their gender is. Religious reasoning does not belong in courts or law, only in personal matter does it count.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Dallas on November 03, 2012, 06:04:28 AM
Leaving religion aside in it's entirety considering this is mlre of a legal issue, there is no logical reason to ban homosexual marriage. You do not have to agree with it, but it should be entirely legal for two conscenting adults to marry, whatever their gender is. Religious reasoning does not belong in courts or law, only in personal matter does it count.

Pretty much this.

In all fairness there is no reason gays shouldn't be allowed to marry apart from religious folk getting all up in arms about it; claiming it's morally wrong and a 'digusting' thing. I have no problem with it because I simply couldn't care less about who we're allowed to marry, so long as it's all an equal playing field. Why should we be allowed to forbid two people who love each other from being together?
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 03, 2012, 09:46:02 AM
God dammit our values are at stake here, and what of tradition!? I feel sick to my stomach every time I see a woman wearing pants and voting, and don't even get me started about those damned black people mingling with us good wholesome white folk! They should just STOP IT and quit being so inconsiderate, can't they see their lives upset me? I've been taught since childhood that these things that are bad, and it makes me nauseous every time I see this bullshit!

My children deserve to live in a place where good ole morality reigns supreme! By golly, them black people just aren't like us! Why can't they leave us alone and eat in their own restaurants and swim in their own swimming pools, huh?

And the nerve of women these days, cutting their hair shorter and all... such immoral choices. Women ought to know their place in society, it says so right in the Bible! If we continue to tolerate these lifestyles of sin, it will be the downfall of America.

Our very way of life is at stake! Say NO to gender equality! Say NO to racial equality!



...wait a second...

Awww, for a second I thought I had found someone who sympathized with my opinions. Well except for the black people part, however gender equality, blegh. Anyways, back to the actual topic.

They're not even frickin' close, one causes harm to other people, the other just wants the ability to legally wed.
Tell me, why should two people not be allowed to marry just because it disgust you?
They're not fucking flashing, they're not smoking pot, and they're not driving drunk, THEY ARE GETTING MARRIED stop trying to put MARRIAGE together with violent crimes, ANYONE can commit those crimes, just because they're gay doesn't make them more likely.

You're either incredibly dense or a kid, can't tell which. I never said the level of crime was the same, just pointing out the precident. Just because its not on the same level as murder doesn't mean the rules don't apply to it. If you read my comment at all you would know I never said the two were the same. I said I was against same sex marriage because it disgusts me, that's my opinion. Anyone CAN commit those crimes and being gay doesn't increase the chance at all, what I was pointing out is in an earlier argument you implied that every gay person was benign and free from crime, which isn't true. Finally, if you reply once again saying I'm trying to lump marriage in with violent crimes I won't waste the words replying to you. I am merely using examples to point out rules.

What exactly do you mean by rules?

Rules as in the  way new legistlation is regulated and judged, aka the constitutional rules that govern what the government can and cannot do. As someone earlier said, if you desperatly need gays to marry, then get married in the government and call it a civil union, don't force churches to marry you.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Dallas on November 03, 2012, 10:29:56 AM
Gaming Zealot, what are you doing with your time? How can you hate all these people or find them disgusting? How? I am genuinely intrigued as to how you could be so intolerant. Religion isn't set in stone, you know, it changes over the years, why not let it become more homosexual-tolerant? Also, what's up with the woman rights thing, do you have an issue with gender equality?   
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 03, 2012, 11:09:49 AM
Gaming Zealot, what are you doing with your time? How can you hate all these people or find them disgusting? How? I am genuinely intrigued as to how you could be so intolerant. Religion isn't set in stone, you know, it changes over the years, why not let it become more homosexual-tolerant? Also, what's up with the woman rights thing, do you have an issue with gender equality?

Well, for the hate part one of the reasons I hate so many people would probably be my upbringing. My father is an incredibly cynical person who always took the time to explain to me why everyone not in our family is a greedy ignorant dumbass, but other than that probably the rest is natural. The disgust for gays I would imagine comes from being raised in a north eastern all white upper-middle class area. Pinpointing the exact origin of everthing I hate is dificult. As for religion, as I stated in my first post I'm not really a religious guy, my views are not caused by religion. I have many views that completly go against my religion, I'm barely even a Christian. And yes, I have an issue with gender equality, but that's not the point of this discussion.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: YankeeSamurai on November 03, 2012, 11:40:53 AM
Well, for the hate part one of the reasons I hate so many people would probably be my upbringing. My father is an incredibly cynical person who always took the time to explain to me why everyone not in our family is a greedy ignorant dumbass, but other than that probably the rest is natural. The disgust for gays I would imagine comes from being raised in a north eastern all white upper-middle class area. Pinpointing the exact origin of everthing I hate is dificult. As for religion, as I stated in my first post I'm not really a religious guy, my views are not caused by religion. I have many views that completly go against my religion, I'm barely even a Christian. And yes, I have an issue with gender equality, but that's not the point of this discussion.

Is your north eastern white upper-middle class upbringing the standard upon which millions of other peoples' lives should be valued?

Would you describe your hate as well-defined and with objective cause, or do you just hate things for reasons you can't quite pin down?
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: [LP]GMK-MRL on November 03, 2012, 11:41:18 AM
The disgust for gays I would imagine comes from being raised in a north eastern all white upper-middle class area.

See, it started when Southern Christian Extremist and Zealots stated in the bible that being Gay was unholy. It spread some how to the North and I have no idea how it got to the North Eastern all white Upper-middle class area if it even did. But I know for a fact that the disgust for gays comes from the South and it stayed in the South or midwest for a long while and still to this day.

As I said before they made a movie about this: Brokeback Moutain.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 03, 2012, 11:57:19 AM
Well, for the hate part one of the reasons I hate so many people would probably be my upbringing. My father is an incredibly cynical person who always took the time to explain to me why everyone not in our family is a greedy ignorant dumbass, but other than that probably the rest is natural. The disgust for gays I would imagine comes from being raised in a north eastern all white upper-middle class area. Pinpointing the exact origin of everthing I hate is dificult. As for religion, as I stated in my first post I'm not really a religious guy, my views are not caused by religion. I have many views that completly go against my religion, I'm barely even a Christian. And yes, I have an issue with gender equality, but that's not the point of this discussion.

Is your north eastern white upper-middle class upbringing the standard upon which millions of other peoples' lives should be valued?

Would you describe your hate as well-defined and with objective cause, or do you just hate things for reasons you can't quite pin down?

Meh, I don't really know what specifically, being region or whatever caused my disgust for gays, hard to trace back and find a cause. Anyways my hate for some things is well defined and objective, and for others its just I've always felt disgusted by it. I have specific reasons I can justify hating gays with, except those reasons spread to many things and I really don't feel like stating because I've found most people tend not to like my reasons.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Dallas on November 03, 2012, 12:02:34 PM
At least try and explain your reasons other wise this image will be everyone's thoughts from now on...
(http://puu.sh/1lVVA)
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 03, 2012, 12:21:25 PM
At least try and explain your reasons other wise this image will be everyone's thoughts from now on...
(http://puu.sh/1lVVA)

That's a good bit better than what people will think if I choose to explain my reasons, plus it would take to long to explain everything that influences it in detail. For now it will suffice to just say homosexuality disgusts me.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: YankeeSamurai on November 03, 2012, 12:27:33 PM
Let him hate homosexuals. It's his choice, and he's entitled to his opinion. You guys giving him shit for hating gays is the same thing as him giving you guys shit for accepting gays.

lol you giving us shit for us giving him shit for giving shit to gays is the same thing as him giving us shit for you giving us shit for accepting gays

Anyway, I do not prevent people from hating homosexuals. While they're at it, however, I enjoy asking them questions that help me better understand their opinions.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: [LP]GMK-MRL on November 03, 2012, 01:53:49 PM
Let him hate homosexuals. It's his choice, and he's entitled to his opinion. You guys giving him shit for hating gays is the same thing as him giving you guys shit for accepting gays.

lol you giving us shit for us giving him shit for giving shit to gays is the same thing as him giving us shit for you giving us shit for accepting gays

Anyway, I do not prevent people from hating homosexuals. While they're at it, however, I enjoy asking them questions that help me better understand their opinions.

He wasn't giving shit to gays though. He was stating his opinion. Also, I wasn't giving anyone shit, I was just saying that you should respect his opinion, something almost everyone on Catalyst refuses to do.

I'm honestly trying not to give him shit. Just trying to give him facts on the origin of homosexual hate. Opinions are opinions, not fact.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: tics on November 03, 2012, 02:42:49 PM
Homosexuality and gay marriage is real simple to me...

Homosexuality:
- You don't choose to be gay. How do I know? I'm gay and I didn't wake up one morning and decide to like dick. It just happened.
- If two guys being happy with each other disgusts you, then you disgust me. You need to fucking learn to tolerate people if you want to survive in modern society. Does a black guy and a white girl having a relationship disgust you? I mean really, your arguments sound like those of supporters of segregation in the 1960s.

Gay marriage:
- Religion has no place in a debate on gay marriage for two reasons: the First Amendment, marriage in the Bible often involved multiple wives, concubines, and slaves.
- There are so many (nearly a hundred) benefits to marriage, and it's unfair to restrict that to a man and a woman.
- Don't like gay marriage? Don't marry your own sex! It's really that simple.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: cookiesofamerica on November 03, 2012, 09:00:47 PM
In my opinion, every human being's mind is perverted one way to another (this doesn't mean it's bad) When we have an sexual attraction to someone (or something) Is uh.. shit let me just give an example: If  male 1 is attracted to  male 2 because of let's say we call this attraction:A. In male's 1 mind is attracted by people with A, and let's say this attraction would be Male only, then in this case Male 1 would be attracted to Male 2. It's the same thing with Male being attracted to Female. (I think i made it more confusing but w/e)

I don't agree with Homosexuality but that doesn't it should be against the law, because it's a person's choice. As human beings our minds are perverted but some minds are more than others.

Now for the "Oh we were born that way." Is bullshit. If that were the case human beings would be able to produce no matter what the sex was. For example: Since Pedophilia is an sexual attraction (and an disorder) then why are they arrested if doctors considered this as a disorder? Wouldn't there be ways of keeping it to a minimum? Like autism for example, if we see symptoms at the first signs like: Unable to speak (My brother has autism and he couldn't speak until a the age of 4.), sameness, stacking. Then It can be treated with mental help. But it's an sexual attraction, so it would be the same thing as my example, it can be the same thing with other crimes that let's say Person A was going to rob Person B, this is a thought created by Person A because of something Person B owns.

TL;DR: All Sexual orientations and fetishes are all in perspective of one's mind, in this case we are all bisexuals.
How could it not be a choice? I couldn't bring myself to like dick in my ass and I'm sure a gay guy would find vagina repulsive. It's not like people wake up one day and think "I WANT TO GET FUCKED IN THE ASS BY 30 MEN AT THE SAME TIME"

If that wasn't sarcasm I would say this(And that assumption was right, then well shit.):

Summary

Sexual orientation isn't through a conscious process it's subconscious. For whatever was the sexual attraction for the sexual orientation to form. (Homo/hetero/bisexual it all outcomes as so) I suppose my robber theory was exaggerated because sexual orientation takes one's mind experience for a long amount of time (It probably can take at least 14 or more years or so (some longer than others) to develop but to let's say a church reconverts that it takes longer because the subconscious has how you say a similar symptom of autism:Sameness). Another reason for people to change there sexual orientation is through experience of let's say An unnamed Male sexual attraction to other males because maybe the experience of females were negative or has witnessed.

Look at this video for example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jg9cz11SJlU


As you can see this male had to deal with a negative effect of the opposite gender, The unnamed male might think that: "Well if this is what women are maybe I should have a different sexual orientation, where I might not have to deal with this." This problem could be solved through a subconscious process as to choose a different sexual orientation or not to. It's in this case their "choice" whether to choose to stay with their current sexual orientation or change.

I suppose that means a male lion, who can have as many sexual partners as he wants, figures it makes more sense to have intercourse with another male lion all of a sudden? No. It's genes, occurrences in the brain that as a fetus, were abnormal and caused them to have reverse sexual orientation. Hardly a choice, unless they were a closet homosexual who decided to come out after some time.
So you're saying it's through genes? Then in that case I like how does one get this gene if it can be passed down through family? If it's a mental disorder we would know by a parent being a carrier of this gene. If you got an article of this type of such thing (and don't give me cba attitude it makes you a hypocrit)
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: smt on November 03, 2012, 09:08:14 PM
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2005/08/14/what_makes_people_gay/?page=full

This is very interesting, but to sum it up no one really knows, it's just a thing that cant be changed but can possibly be predicted non-scientifically, some people are gay, some aren't, and if you can't accept that then you either have some pretty bad issues with other peoples living which 9/10 times won't affect you in any way or you're just incredibly closed minded, which doesn't fit in with the world getting ever more liberal.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: cookiesofamerica on November 03, 2012, 09:19:17 PM
Homosexuality and gay marriage is real simple to me...

Homosexuality:
- You don't choose to be gay. How do I know? I'm gay and I didn't wake up one morning and decide to like dick. It just happened.
- If two guys being happy with each other disgusts you, then you disgust me. You need to fucking learn to tolerate people if you want to survive in modern society. Does a black guy and a white girl having a relationship disgust you? I mean really, your arguments sound like those of supporters of segregation in the 1960s.

Gay marriage:
- Religion has no place in a debate on gay marriage for two reasons: the First Amendment, marriage in the Bible often involved multiple wives, concubines, and slaves.
- There are so many (nearly a hundred) benefits to marriage, and it's unfair to restrict that to a man and a woman.
- Don't like gay marriage? Don't marry your own sex! It's really that simple.

Did you not read what I posted?

It's through a subconscious process of one's experience, sometimes sexual orientation is irreversible because what I can tell because it rejects it. It's like how a person can reject a new type of a learning curve because one was taught from a different type of learning curve.

This doesn't mean we should make one's orientationas a social taboo. We should respect their views as I respect the views of a conservative or Buddhist or how one thinks about love,life,religion or politics.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: tics on November 03, 2012, 09:30:54 PM
Homosexuality and gay marriage is real simple to me...

Homosexuality:
- You don't choose to be gay. How do I know? I'm gay and I didn't wake up one morning and decide to like dick. It just happened.
- If two guys being happy with each other disgusts you, then you disgust me. You need to fucking learn to tolerate people if you want to survive in modern society. Does a black guy and a white girl having a relationship disgust you? I mean really, your arguments sound like those of supporters of segregation in the 1960s.

Gay marriage:
- Religion has no place in a debate on gay marriage for two reasons: the First Amendment, marriage in the Bible often involved multiple wives, concubines, and slaves.
- There are so many (nearly a hundred) benefits to marriage, and it's unfair to restrict that to a man and a woman.
- Don't like gay marriage? Don't marry your own sex! It's really that simple.

Did you not read what I posted?

It's through a subconscious process of one's experience, sometimes sexual orientation is irreversible because what I can tell because it rejects it. It's like how a person can reject a new type of a learning curve because one was taught from a different type of learning curve.

This doesn't mean we should make one's orientationas a social taboo. We should respect their views as I respect the views of a conservative or Buddhist or how one thinks about love,life,religion or politics.
My post wasn't just directed at you.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: garry :D on November 03, 2012, 09:35:09 PM
make love, not war

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeCLwtWbhEs
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 03, 2012, 10:31:32 PM
All the people above giving me and people who dislike gays shit about being close minded, don't assume that everyone who hates gays is some redneck living in his trailer. I'm very open minded and have quite a few liberal friends that I enjoy debating with. I have a bunch of radical ideas and beliefs but that doesn't mean I'm uneducated or disgusting, it just means my opinions differ  from yours.
Homosexuality and gay marriage is real simple to me...

Homosexuality:
- You don't choose to be gay. How do I know? I'm gay and I didn't wake up one morning and decide to like dick. It just happened.
- If two guys being happy with each other disgusts you, then you disgust me. You need to fucking learn to tolerate people if you want to survive in modern society. Does a black guy and a white girl having a relationship disgust you? I mean really, your arguments sound like those of supporters of segregation in the 1960s.

Gay marriage:
- Religion has no place in a debate on gay marriage for two reasons: the First Amendment, marriage in the Bible often involved multiple wives, concubines, and slaves.
- There are so many (nearly a hundred) benefits to marriage, and it's unfair to restrict that to a man and a woman.
- Don't like gay marriage? Don't marry your own sex! It's really that simple.

Homosexuality:
-I agree not a choice, nobody in their right mind would choose to be gay as you end up being the subject of hate and abuse.
-That's like saying I'm disgusted at people who hate spiders or snakes. I didn't choose to hate gays any more than you chose to be gay. I personally don't have an issue with black/white relationships.

Gay Marriage:
-The First Ammendment is actually a reason Religion does have a say in it, in that it says the government cannot make laws restricting the practices of religion, AKA, forcing churches to marry gay couples. Also you are implying that having multiple wives, concubines, and  slaves is bad. You are asking people to allow gays to marry, despite how the government will not allow bigomy despite its religious nature, so I could say YOU disgust me because you are trying to insult peoples choices of marriage while only defending your own.
-Marriage was, is, and always should be between a man and a woman. I've previously  stated it, you want a legally recognized union, get it done by government officials and name it something else, like civil union. Keep religion out of it.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: tics on November 03, 2012, 10:35:48 PM
All the people above giving me and people who dislike gays shit about being close minded, don't assume that everyone who hates gays is some redneck living in his trailer. I'm very open minded and have quite a few liberal friends that I enjoy debating with. I have a bunch of radical ideas and beliefs but that doesn't mean I'm uneducated or disgusting, it just means my opinions differ  from yours.
Homosexuality and gay marriage is real simple to me...

Homosexuality:
- You don't choose to be gay. How do I know? I'm gay and I didn't wake up one morning and decide to like dick. It just happened.
- If two guys being happy with each other disgusts you, then you disgust me. You need to fucking learn to tolerate people if you want to survive in modern society. Does a black guy and a white girl having a relationship disgust you? I mean really, your arguments sound like those of supporters of segregation in the 1960s.

Gay marriage:
- Religion has no place in a debate on gay marriage for two reasons: the First Amendment, marriage in the Bible often involved multiple wives, concubines, and slaves.
- There are so many (nearly a hundred) benefits to marriage, and it's unfair to restrict that to a man and a woman.
- Don't like gay marriage? Don't marry your own sex! It's really that simple.

Homosexuality:
-I agree not a choice, nobody in their right mind would choose to be gay as you end up being the subject of hate and abuse.
-That's like saying I'm disgusted at people who hate spiders or snakes. I didn't choose to hate gays any more than you chose to be gay. I personally don't have an issue with black/white relationships.

Gay Marriage:
-The First Ammendment is actually a reason Religion does have a say in it, in that it says the government cannot make laws restricting the practices of religion, AKA, forcing churches to marry gay couples. Also you are implying that having multiple wives, concubines, and  slaves is bad. You are asking people to allow gays to marry, despite how the government will not allow bigomy despite its religious nature, so I could say YOU disgust me because you are trying to insult peoples choices of marriage while only defending your own.
-Marriage was, is, and always should be between a man and a woman. I've previously  stated it, you want a legally recognized union, get it done by government officials and name it something else, like civil union. Keep religion out of it.

Homosexuality:
- You're taught to hate, you're not born with hate.

Gay Marriage:
- No politician is suggesting that churches be forced to marry. Therefore, no, religion does not belong in the argument. We're discussing civil marriage, not religious marriage.
- In history, same sex marriage has happened. (Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_same-sex_unions)) You must recognize before debating this that marriage is much older than the Christian faith.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: [LP]GMK-MRL on November 03, 2012, 10:58:06 PM
All the people above giving me and people who dislike gays shit about being close minded, don't assume that everyone who hates gays is some redneck living in his trailer. I'm very open minded and have quite a few liberal friends that I enjoy debating with. I have a bunch of radical ideas and beliefs but that doesn't mean I'm uneducated or disgusting, it just means my opinions differ  from yours.
Homosexuality and gay marriage is real simple to me...

Homosexuality:
- You don't choose to be gay. How do I know? I'm gay and I didn't wake up one morning and decide to like dick. It just happened.
- If two guys being happy with each other disgusts you, then you disgust me. You need to fucking learn to tolerate people if you want to survive in modern society. Does a black guy and a white girl having a relationship disgust you? I mean really, your arguments sound like those of supporters of segregation in the 1960s.

Gay marriage:
- Religion has no place in a debate on gay marriage for two reasons: the First Amendment, marriage in the Bible often involved multiple wives, concubines, and slaves.
- There are so many (nearly a hundred) benefits to marriage, and it's unfair to restrict that to a man and a woman.
- Don't like gay marriage? Don't marry your own sex! It's really that simple.

Homosexuality:
-I agree not a choice, nobody in their right mind would choose to be gay as you end up being the subject of hate and abuse.
-That's like saying I'm disgusted at people who hate spiders or snakes. I didn't choose to hate gays any more than you chose to be gay. I personally don't have an issue with black/white relationships.

Gay Marriage:
-The First Ammendment is actually a reason Religion does have a say in it, in that it says the government cannot make laws restricting the practices of religion, AKA, forcing churches to marry gay couples. Also you are implying that having multiple wives, concubines, and  slaves is bad. You are asking people to allow gays to marry, despite how the government will not allow bigomy despite its religious nature, so I could say YOU disgust me because you are trying to insult peoples choices of marriage while only defending your own.
-Marriage was, is, and always should be between a man and a woman. I've previously  stated it, you want a legally recognized union, get it done by government officials and name it something else, like civil union. Keep religion out of it.

Homosexuality:
- You're taught to hate, you're not born with hate.

Gay Marriage:
- No politician is suggesting that churches be forced to marry. Therefore, no, religion does not belong in the argument. We're discussing civil marriage, not religious marriage.
- In history, same sex marriage has happened. (Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_same-sex_unions)) You must recognize before debating this that marriage is much older than the Christian faith.

To be funny and loosen up some tension.

It's hilariously ironic that your sig is Face Down, Ass Up and you're supporting gay marriage.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: tics on November 03, 2012, 11:04:33 PM
All the people above giving me and people who dislike gays shit about being close minded, don't assume that everyone who hates gays is some redneck living in his trailer. I'm very open minded and have quite a few liberal friends that I enjoy debating with. I have a bunch of radical ideas and beliefs but that doesn't mean I'm uneducated or disgusting, it just means my opinions differ  from yours.
Homosexuality and gay marriage is real simple to me...

Homosexuality:
- You don't choose to be gay. How do I know? I'm gay and I didn't wake up one morning and decide to like dick. It just happened.
- If two guys being happy with each other disgusts you, then you disgust me. You need to fucking learn to tolerate people if you want to survive in modern society. Does a black guy and a white girl having a relationship disgust you? I mean really, your arguments sound like those of supporters of segregation in the 1960s.

Gay marriage:
- Religion has no place in a debate on gay marriage for two reasons: the First Amendment, marriage in the Bible often involved multiple wives, concubines, and slaves.
- There are so many (nearly a hundred) benefits to marriage, and it's unfair to restrict that to a man and a woman.
- Don't like gay marriage? Don't marry your own sex! It's really that simple.

Homosexuality:
-I agree not a choice, nobody in their right mind would choose to be gay as you end up being the subject of hate and abuse.
-That's like saying I'm disgusted at people who hate spiders or snakes. I didn't choose to hate gays any more than you chose to be gay. I personally don't have an issue with black/white relationships.

Gay Marriage:
-The First Ammendment is actually a reason Religion does have a say in it, in that it says the government cannot make laws restricting the practices of religion, AKA, forcing churches to marry gay couples. Also you are implying that having multiple wives, concubines, and  slaves is bad. You are asking people to allow gays to marry, despite how the government will not allow bigomy despite its religious nature, so I could say YOU disgust me because you are trying to insult peoples choices of marriage while only defending your own.
-Marriage was, is, and always should be between a man and a woman. I've previously  stated it, you want a legally recognized union, get it done by government officials and name it something else, like civil union. Keep religion out of it.

Homosexuality:
- You're taught to hate, you're not born with hate.

Gay Marriage:
- No politician is suggesting that churches be forced to marry. Therefore, no, religion does not belong in the argument. We're discussing civil marriage, not religious marriage.
- In history, same sex marriage has happened. (Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_same-sex_unions)) You must recognize before debating this that marriage is much older than the Christian faith.

To be funny and loosen up some tension.

It's hilariously ironic that your sig is Face Down, Ass Up and you're supporting gay marriage.
My ex-boyfriend, when we were still dating, sent it to me as advise for my first day of high school :3
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: [LP]GMK-MRL on November 03, 2012, 11:10:58 PM
All the people above giving me and people who dislike gays shit about being close minded, don't assume that everyone who hates gays is some redneck living in his trailer. I'm very open minded and have quite a few liberal friends that I enjoy debating with. I have a bunch of radical ideas and beliefs but that doesn't mean I'm uneducated or disgusting, it just means my opinions differ  from yours.
Homosexuality and gay marriage is real simple to me...

Homosexuality:
- You don't choose to be gay. How do I know? I'm gay and I didn't wake up one morning and decide to like dick. It just happened.
- If two guys being happy with each other disgusts you, then you disgust me. You need to fucking learn to tolerate people if you want to survive in modern society. Does a black guy and a white girl having a relationship disgust you? I mean really, your arguments sound like those of supporters of segregation in the 1960s.

Gay marriage:
- Religion has no place in a debate on gay marriage for two reasons: the First Amendment, marriage in the Bible often involved multiple wives, concubines, and slaves.
- There are so many (nearly a hundred) benefits to marriage, and it's unfair to restrict that to a man and a woman.
- Don't like gay marriage? Don't marry your own sex! It's really that simple.

Homosexuality:
-I agree not a choice, nobody in their right mind would choose to be gay as you end up being the subject of hate and abuse.
-That's like saying I'm disgusted at people who hate spiders or snakes. I didn't choose to hate gays any more than you chose to be gay. I personally don't have an issue with black/white relationships.

Gay Marriage:
-The First Ammendment is actually a reason Religion does have a say in it, in that it says the government cannot make laws restricting the practices of religion, AKA, forcing churches to marry gay couples. Also you are implying that having multiple wives, concubines, and  slaves is bad. You are asking people to allow gays to marry, despite how the government will not allow bigomy despite its religious nature, so I could say YOU disgust me because you are trying to insult peoples choices of marriage while only defending your own.
-Marriage was, is, and always should be between a man and a woman. I've previously  stated it, you want a legally recognized union, get it done by government officials and name it something else, like civil union. Keep religion out of it.

Homosexuality:
- You're taught to hate, you're not born with hate.

Gay Marriage:
- No politician is suggesting that churches be forced to marry. Therefore, no, religion does not belong in the argument. We're discussing civil marriage, not religious marriage.
- In history, same sex marriage has happened. (Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_same-sex_unions)) You must recognize before debating this that marriage is much older than the Christian faith.

To be funny and loosen up some tension.

It's hilariously ironic that your sig is Face Down, Ass Up and you're supporting gay marriage.
My ex-boyfriend, when we were still dating, sent it to me as advise for my first day of high school :3

Good advice. I now give him slight props. But the purpose of the joke was to point out....the ironic homosexuality....if you're a male at all....idk i'm confusing myself.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: tics on November 03, 2012, 11:19:41 PM
All the people above giving me and people who dislike gays shit about being close minded, don't assume that everyone who hates gays is some redneck living in his trailer. I'm very open minded and have quite a few liberal friends that I enjoy debating with. I have a bunch of radical ideas and beliefs but that doesn't mean I'm uneducated or disgusting, it just means my opinions differ  from yours.
Homosexuality and gay marriage is real simple to me...

Homosexuality:
- You don't choose to be gay. How do I know? I'm gay and I didn't wake up one morning and decide to like dick. It just happened.
- If two guys being happy with each other disgusts you, then you disgust me. You need to fucking learn to tolerate people if you want to survive in modern society. Does a black guy and a white girl having a relationship disgust you? I mean really, your arguments sound like those of supporters of segregation in the 1960s.

Gay marriage:
- Religion has no place in a debate on gay marriage for two reasons: the First Amendment, marriage in the Bible often involved multiple wives, concubines, and slaves.
- There are so many (nearly a hundred) benefits to marriage, and it's unfair to restrict that to a man and a woman.
- Don't like gay marriage? Don't marry your own sex! It's really that simple.

Homosexuality:
-I agree not a choice, nobody in their right mind would choose to be gay as you end up being the subject of hate and abuse.
-That's like saying I'm disgusted at people who hate spiders or snakes. I didn't choose to hate gays any more than you chose to be gay. I personally don't have an issue with black/white relationships.

Gay Marriage:
-The First Ammendment is actually a reason Religion does have a say in it, in that it says the government cannot make laws restricting the practices of religion, AKA, forcing churches to marry gay couples. Also you are implying that having multiple wives, concubines, and  slaves is bad. You are asking people to allow gays to marry, despite how the government will not allow bigomy despite its religious nature, so I could say YOU disgust me because you are trying to insult peoples choices of marriage while only defending your own.
-Marriage was, is, and always should be between a man and a woman. I've previously  stated it, you want a legally recognized union, get it done by government officials and name it something else, like civil union. Keep religion out of it.

Homosexuality:
- You're taught to hate, you're not born with hate.

Gay Marriage:
- No politician is suggesting that churches be forced to marry. Therefore, no, religion does not belong in the argument. We're discussing civil marriage, not religious marriage.
- In history, same sex marriage has happened. (Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_same-sex_unions)) You must recognize before debating this that marriage is much older than the Christian faith.

To be funny and loosen up some tension.

It's hilariously ironic that your sig is Face Down, Ass Up and you're supporting gay marriage.
My ex-boyfriend, when we were still dating, sent it to me as advise for my first day of high school :3

Good advice. I now give him slight props. But the purpose of the joke was to point out....the ironic homosexuality....if you're a male at all....idk i'm confusing myself.
Yea, I'm male. In case you couldn't tell from my avatar, I'm gay.

Back on topic please, though.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: [LP]GMK-MRL on November 03, 2012, 11:37:52 PM
All the people above giving me and people who dislike gays shit about being close minded, don't assume that everyone who hates gays is some redneck living in his trailer. I'm very open minded and have quite a few liberal friends that I enjoy debating with. I have a bunch of radical ideas and beliefs but that doesn't mean I'm uneducated or disgusting, it just means my opinions differ  from yours.
Homosexuality and gay marriage is real simple to me...

Homosexuality:
- You don't choose to be gay. How do I know? I'm gay and I didn't wake up one morning and decide to like dick. It just happened.
- If two guys being happy with each other disgusts you, then you disgust me. You need to fucking learn to tolerate people if you want to survive in modern society. Does a black guy and a white girl having a relationship disgust you? I mean really, your arguments sound like those of supporters of segregation in the 1960s.

Gay marriage:
- Religion has no place in a debate on gay marriage for two reasons: the First Amendment, marriage in the Bible often involved multiple wives, concubines, and slaves.
- There are so many (nearly a hundred) benefits to marriage, and it's unfair to restrict that to a man and a woman.
- Don't like gay marriage? Don't marry your own sex! It's really that simple.

Homosexuality:
-I agree not a choice, nobody in their right mind would choose to be gay as you end up being the subject of hate and abuse.
-That's like saying I'm disgusted at people who hate spiders or snakes. I didn't choose to hate gays any more than you chose to be gay. I personally don't have an issue with black/white relationships.

Gay Marriage:
-The First Ammendment is actually a reason Religion does have a say in it, in that it says the government cannot make laws restricting the practices of religion, AKA, forcing churches to marry gay couples. Also you are implying that having multiple wives, concubines, and  slaves is bad. You are asking people to allow gays to marry, despite how the government will not allow bigomy despite its religious nature, so I could say YOU disgust me because you are trying to insult peoples choices of marriage while only defending your own.
-Marriage was, is, and always should be between a man and a woman. I've previously  stated it, you want a legally recognized union, get it done by government officials and name it something else, like civil union. Keep religion out of it.

Homosexuality:
- You're taught to hate, you're not born with hate.

Gay Marriage:
- No politician is suggesting that churches be forced to marry. Therefore, no, religion does not belong in the argument. We're discussing civil marriage, not religious marriage.
- In history, same sex marriage has happened. (Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_same-sex_unions)) You must recognize before debating this that marriage is much older than the Christian faith.

To be funny and loosen up some tension.

It's hilariously ironic that your sig is Face Down, Ass Up and you're supporting gay marriage.
My ex-boyfriend, when we were still dating, sent it to me as advise for my first day of high school :3

Good advice. I now give him slight props. But the purpose of the joke was to point out....the ironic homosexuality....if you're a male at all....idk i'm confusing myself.
Yea, I'm male. In case you couldn't tell from my avatar, I'm gay.

Back on topic please, though.

Yes, erm sorry. Didn't mean for it to drag off topic (I also thought the avatar was a joke my apologies.)
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Pielolz on November 04, 2012, 01:28:28 AM

Yea, I'm male. In case you couldn't tell from my avatar, I'm gay.

Back on topic please, though.


Thanks for the support and defense of the morality of the situation.


and for helping me man up to coming out
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: YankeeSamurai on November 04, 2012, 01:51:35 AM
make love, not war

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeCLwtWbhEs

that's the video that inspired my first reply...
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: raged on November 04, 2012, 01:29:40 AM
loving the religious people in this thread who don't want to give people equality on the basis their beliefs derive from a book made 2000 years ago

everybody should have the right to get married regardless of gender or sexuality inc transexuals and the like, marriage in the past was considered more of a religious union together but today it's nothing like that, there's only a hint of religion to some marriages (not everybody gets married in a church) and hence so they shouldn't have the ability to say who can get married and who can't.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: swag master spiderman on November 04, 2012, 12:00:11 PM
Can someone explain to me why people follow the traditions of male-female only marriages in the bible but not the messed up shit that the bible teaches and approves of such as slavery and murder? I was under the impression you were supposed to follow all the teachings of God, but I wouldn't really know. It's a shame people are being denied marriage because of a questionable Deity whose existence cannot actually be genuinely proved.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Dallas on November 04, 2012, 12:06:40 PM
Can someone explain to me why people follow the traditions of male-female only marriages in the bible but not the messed up shit that the bible teaches and approves of such as slavery and murder? I was under the impression you were supposed to follow all the teachings of God, but I wouldn't really know. It's a shame people are being denied marriage because of a questionable Deity whose existence cannot actually be genuinely proved.

It's funny because this pretty much nailed it. Why do we judge the world by standards set when we were isolated pockets of communities living in deserts?
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 04, 2012, 12:28:07 PM
All the people above giving me and people who dislike gays shit about being close minded, don't assume that everyone who hates gays is some redneck living in his trailer. I'm very open minded and have quite a few liberal friends that I enjoy debating with. I have a bunch of radical ideas and beliefs but that doesn't mean I'm uneducated or disgusting, it just means my opinions differ  from yours.
Homosexuality and gay marriage is real simple to me...

Homosexuality:
- You don't choose to be gay. How do I know? I'm gay and I didn't wake up one morning and decide to like dick. It just happened.
- If two guys being happy with each other disgusts you, then you disgust me. You need to fucking learn to tolerate people if you want to survive in modern society. Does a black guy and a white girl having a relationship disgust you? I mean really, your arguments sound like those of supporters of segregation in the 1960s.

Gay marriage:
- Religion has no place in a debate on gay marriage for two reasons: the First Amendment, marriage in the Bible often involved multiple wives, concubines, and slaves.
- There are so many (nearly a hundred) benefits to marriage, and it's unfair to restrict that to a man and a woman.
- Don't like gay marriage? Don't marry your own sex! It's really that simple.

Homosexuality:
-I agree not a choice, nobody in their right mind would choose to be gay as you end up being the subject of hate and abuse.
-That's like saying I'm disgusted at people who hate spiders or snakes. I didn't choose to hate gays any more than you chose to be gay. I personally don't have an issue with black/white relationships.

Gay Marriage:
-The First Ammendment is actually a reason Religion does have a say in it, in that it says the government cannot make laws restricting the practices of religion, AKA, forcing churches to marry gay couples. Also you are implying that having multiple wives, concubines, and  slaves is bad. You are asking people to allow gays to marry, despite how the government will not allow bigomy despite its religious nature, so I could say YOU disgust me because you are trying to insult peoples choices of marriage while only defending your own.
-Marriage was, is, and always should be between a man and a woman. I've previously  stated it, you want a legally recognized union, get it done by government officials and name it something else, like civil union. Keep religion out of it.

Homosexuality:
- You're taught to hate, you're not born with hate.

Gay Marriage:
- No politician is suggesting that churches be forced to marry. Therefore, no, religion does not belong in the argument. We're discussing civil marriage, not religious marriage.
- In history, same sex marriage has happened. (Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_same-sex_unions)) You must recognize before debating this that marriage is much older than the Christian faith.

Homosexuality:
-You both cannot prove that I wasn't born with disgust for it, but you also can't prove that gay people are either. Neither has been proven either way.

Gay Marriage:
-Actually, politicians are arguing to force churches to marry gays, under similar rules to no denial of services most buisnesses ust adhere to, since churches are considered non-profit organizations. Religion has a say in this as marriage has always been a religious practice, if you really didn't care about it not being a religious union, then you wouldn't care if it had its name changed to civil union and was not performed by a church. The fact that no one supporting gay marriage so far has said that is a good idea clearly means despite all of your anti-religion behavior, you refuse to disconnect gay marriage from the church.
-While historically gay marriages have happened it is both not older than the bible, since you assumed only christians hated gays, but jewish people did too. It simply took a while for christians to become the main power in the world, but even with that the practice of banning gay marriage is much older, dating back to thousands of years B.C. back when Jesus was alive, rather than the brief span in which it was allowed during Roman times.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Pielolz on November 04, 2012, 02:21:18 PM
Where in the bible, exact page, line, pargraph and so forth, does it say gay marriage is wrong?

And when did Jesus, day, month, year, context, situation, did he say "Gays are wrong"?


I genuinly want to know.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 04, 2012, 02:31:30 PM
Where in the bible, exact page, line, pargraph and so forth, does it say gay marriage is wrong?

And when did Jesus, day, month, year, context, situation, did he say "Gays are wrong"?


I genuinly want to know.

There may be more but I don't really  know the bible so I just looked a few up.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God."

Leviticus 18:22 - "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable."

Leviticus 20:13 - "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: smt on November 04, 2012, 02:38:04 PM
Anyone who follows the bible so strictly as to say that a gay couple should "be put to death" is frankly retarded, but I'm assuming no one follows it that strictly, the Bible - as with other holy writings from other religions - are incredibly outdated and just don't really work in modern times anymore, I'm pretty sure the Torah still has writings about stoning people etc etc, I have no problem with people being religious but following the Holy writings word for word (when most people around the foundation of these religious probably couldn't write anyway) is just a little on the silly side
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Pielolz on November 04, 2012, 02:43:15 PM
Where in the bible, exact page, line, pargraph and so forth, does it say gay marriage is wrong?

And when did Jesus, day, month, year, context, situation, did he say "Gays are wrong"?


I genuinly want to know.

There may be more but I don't really  know the bible so I just looked a few up.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God."

Leviticus 18:22 - "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable."

Leviticus 20:13 - "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."


Come @ me

But; you cannot allow such VIOLENT and horrendous writings guide your life, for you will bring yourself unto ruination. Whom dare claims they have the right to murder some one in cold blood for their preferences?  Are you God, Zealot? Are you in such lofty position of power to bring death upon some one for their preferences? I doubt you are in such a lofty position; you cannot judge others without bringing judgement upon yourself.

Also, God always preached peace, and equality, whom are you to twist such words into hatred and bile?
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 04, 2012, 03:28:37 PM
Where in the bible, exact page, line, pargraph and so forth, does it say gay marriage is wrong?

And when did Jesus, day, month, year, context, situation, did he say "Gays are wrong"?


I genuinly want to know.

There may be more but I don't really  know the bible so I just looked a few up.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God."

Leviticus 18:22 - "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable."

Leviticus 20:13 - "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."


Come @ me

But; you cannot allow such VIOLENT and horrendous writings guide your life, for you will bring yourself unto ruination. Whom dare claims they have the right to murder some one in cold blood for their preferences?  Are you God, Zealot? Are you in such lofty position of power to bring death upon some one for their preferences? I doubt you are in such a lofty position; you cannot judge others without bringing judgement upon yourself.

Also, God always preached peace, and equality, whom are you to twist such words into hatred and bile?

When did I say that I was religious? Never, my opinoins are my  own and I hate gays for my own reasons, and I was just quoting the bible as you asked someone to do. Also, despite all the preaching about it people like you tend to do, it doesn't require some lofty position to judge others. I can judge others how I wish, just as I do not deny others the right to judge me. For someone who was unaware that the bible had direct anti-homosexuality quotes, you seem to know a lot about what God says as well. You ever heard a Christian say that "ours is a vengeful God?" In case you haden't noticed Christians willingly pray to a God who killed off all but Noah and his family just because he didn't like how the humans turned out. After thinking of that, you really believe they're going to question if the bible tells them gay people should be killed? I don't need a lofty position or religious power to justify my views, nor do I need permission from such people either, and definatly not from you. I judge who I want to judge.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: tics on November 04, 2012, 04:47:58 PM
Leviticus also says that one must be killed if they wear clothing that is a mix of two different materials, or that if your wife is not a virgin she must be stoned. If you're going to follow any of the principles of Leviticus, you must follow all of them.

No politician is arguing to force churches to marry gays. That's a fact. You can lollygag with your idiotic ramblings all you want and try to disprove it, but you're wrong. Churches would not be required to give service as businesses are. Why? Churches don't perform civil marriages, they perform religious marriages. While many religious marriages are also civil marriages, the church is not the one performing or granting the civil marriage, the state is. Therefore, the only entities that would be required to marry gays are the individual states, not the churches. I refuse to argue with you on this particular point any further until you actually read a book. I am absolutely sick and tired of discussing politics with people who think they know everything without ever actually reading anything about the subject and automatically assuming they're correct.

While you are correct that it cannot be conclusively proven that gays are born gay, it also can't be conclusively proven that the Earth is broken up into tectonic plates. They're both theories. In science, many widely accepted statements are theories. The reality is, that in this day and age, the United States is full of know-it-all jackasses who can look at a fact or widely accepted theory and deny it on zero grounds. A theory is true so long as it isn't proven incorrect by someone. However, I can prove that you are born without hate. Factually, your personality is developed by early childhood interactions. You were taught to hate and you were taught that heterosexuality is "natural" and "right" and you were taught to feel disgust towards two gay men or two lesbian women leading happy, successful lives.

People like you who refuse to tolerate other people will be the downfall of this country. No other nation on the world has more discriminating, bigoted people than the United States. For us being the City on a Hill, we sure do set a poor example. No wonder the world hates us.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: BltElite on November 04, 2012, 04:58:51 PM
I'm fine with gays, as long as you don't shove it down my throat.
I'll admit it freaks me out abit thinking about it as i'm not gay myself, but If somebody else wants to be, by all means they can, just don't get me involved in it.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 04, 2012, 05:26:43 PM
Leviticus also says that one must be killed if they wear clothing that is a mix of two different materials, or that if your wife is not a virgin she must be stoned. If you're going to follow any of the principles of Leviticus, you must follow all of them.

No politician is arguing to force churches to marry gays. That's a fact. You can lollygag with your idiotic ramblings all you want and try to disprove it, but you're wrong. Churches would not be required to give service as businesses are. Why? Churches don't perform civil marriages, they perform religious marriages. While many religious marriages are also civil marriages, the church is not the one performing or granting the civil marriage, the state is. Therefore, the only entities that would be required to marry gays are the individual states, not the churches. I refuse to argue with you on this particular point any further until you actually read a book. I am absolutely sick and tired of discussing politics with people who think they know everything without ever actually reading anything about the subject and automatically assuming they're correct.

While you are correct that it cannot be conclusively proven that gays are born gay, it also can't be conclusively proven that the Earth is broken up into tectonic plates. They're both theories. In science, many widely accepted statements are theories. The reality is, that in this day and age, the United States is full of know-it-all jackasses who can look at a fact or widely accepted theory and deny it on zero grounds. A theory is true so long as it isn't proven incorrect by someone. However, I can prove that you are born without hate. Factually, your personality is developed by early childhood interactions. You were taught to hate and you were taught that heterosexuality is "natural" and "right" and you were taught to feel disgust towards two gay men or two lesbian women leading happy, successful lives.

People like you who refuse to tolerate other people will be the downfall of this country. No other nation on the world has more discriminating, bigoted people than the United States. For us being the City on a Hill, we sure do set a poor example. No wonder the world hates us.

I feel almost like just posting "You mad bro?" and leaving this board, because your wording has already made it obvious that I've won the argument just by getting under your skin, but I'll take a short time to answer you. For the last time, I was simply citing bible quotes as requested, I do not use the bible to dictate what I should and should not do. I refuse to argue with you on the second point on the grounds that, just like a stated in my last post, despite all your preening about it not being a religious thing, you still refuse to agree with the idea of changing its name to Civil Union and seperating it completly from the church. You cannot conclusivly prove that I was not born with a revulsion towards gays. There are many things we don't know about the psyche upon birth and in the period afterwards when the brain developes. If we were to assume that you were born gay, it means it couldn't be a gene thing, with all the time  humans have been around, the innability for gays to effectively reproduce would have seen it eliminated a long time ago. This means the most likely cause would be a complication durring birth, otherwise known as a DEFECT. Not something to be accepted and fused into society without a thought, something to be researched, cured, and eliminated. I personallyfind it more likely that being gay is either dictated by experience in society durring childhood, or a mix of both defects and experiences. Either way I see no reason for it to be embraced.

I don't really appreciate you insinuating I'm intollerant, I have no issues with many people generally discriminated against, such as blacks or asians. And saying we have more intolerant people than any other country is both debatable and biased. Since we have more people than many countries obviously that means we need to base it on a percent of population to make it fair, and given that premise I'm sure other countries have us beat in the intollerant category.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: tics on November 04, 2012, 05:55:58 PM
Leviticus also says that one must be killed if they wear clothing that is a mix of two different materials, or that if your wife is not a virgin she must be stoned. If you're going to follow any of the principles of Leviticus, you must follow all of them.

No politician is arguing to force churches to marry gays. That's a fact. You can lollygag with your idiotic ramblings all you want and try to disprove it, but you're wrong. Churches would not be required to give service as businesses are. Why? Churches don't perform civil marriages, they perform religious marriages. While many religious marriages are also civil marriages, the church is not the one performing or granting the civil marriage, the state is. Therefore, the only entities that would be required to marry gays are the individual states, not the churches. I refuse to argue with you on this particular point any further until you actually read a book. I am absolutely sick and tired of discussing politics with people who think they know everything without ever actually reading anything about the subject and automatically assuming they're correct.

While you are correct that it cannot be conclusively proven that gays are born gay, it also can't be conclusively proven that the Earth is broken up into tectonic plates. They're both theories. In science, many widely accepted statements are theories. The reality is, that in this day and age, the United States is full of know-it-all jackasses who can look at a fact or widely accepted theory and deny it on zero grounds. A theory is true so long as it isn't proven incorrect by someone. However, I can prove that you are born without hate. Factually, your personality is developed by early childhood interactions. You were taught to hate and you were taught that heterosexuality is "natural" and "right" and you were taught to feel disgust towards two gay men or two lesbian women leading happy, successful lives.

People like you who refuse to tolerate other people will be the downfall of this country. No other nation on the world has more discriminating, bigoted people than the United States. For us being the City on a Hill, we sure do set a poor example. No wonder the world hates us.

I feel almost like just posting "You mad bro?" and leaving this board, because your wording has already made it obvious that I've won the argument just by getting under your skin, but I'll take a short time to answer you. For the last time, I was simply citing bible quotes as requested, I do not use the bible to dictate what I should and should not do. I refuse to argue with you on the second point on the grounds that, just like a stated in my last post, despite all your preening about it not being a religious thing, you still refuse to agree with the idea of changing its name to Civil Union and seperating it completly from the church. You cannot conclusivly prove that I was not born with a revulsion towards gays. There are many things we don't know about the psyche upon birth and in the period afterwards when the brain developes. If we were to assume that you were born gay, it means it couldn't be a gene thing, with all the time  humans have been around, the innability for gays to effectively reproduce would have seen it eliminated a long time ago. This means the most likely cause would be a complication durring birth, otherwise known as a DEFECT. Not something to be accepted and fused into society without a thought, something to be researched, cured, and eliminated. I personallyfind it more likely that being gay is either dictated by experience in society durring childhood, or a mix of both defects and experiences. Either way I see no reason for it to be embraced.

I don't really appreciate you insinuating I'm intollerant, I have no issues with many people generally discriminated against, such as blacks or asians. And saying we have more intolerant people than any other country is both debatable and biased. Since we have more people than many countries obviously that means we need to base it on a percent of population to make it fair, and given that premise I'm sure other countries have us beat in the intollerant category.
I do not agree with calling it a civil union for same-sex couples and a marriage for opposite-sex couples because this is treating gays as second class citizens. Marriage is NOT solely a religious institution. It is, first and foremost, a state institution. People get married for state benefits. The first marriages in ancient civilizations had nothing to do with religion. That is why I don't agree with it.

You are not a qualified scientists. Qualified scientists will tell you that homosexuality while not conclusively genetic, is not a defect. You also have a false understanding of natural selection. Your logic is that if it is genetic, it would die off since homosexuals can't naturally reproduce. But that would be assuming that the trait can only be dominant. Two brown-haired parents can have a blonde kid because one (or both) of the parents had the blonde gene, it just wasn't the dominant trait for hair color. Similarly, two straight parents can have a gay kid because one (or both) of the parents have the gay gene, it just wasn't the dominant trait. (That is, of course, assuming it is genetic.)

Hypothetically, however, let's assume it is a defect. Is it your place or even society's place to tell a person what to embrace and what not to embrace? Hell no. If someone's gay (like me) and fine with being gay (like me) and embraces being gay (like me) and wants to lead a happy life with a boyfriend or husband (like me), then that is their choice to embrace their sexuality. It shouldn't matter to you.

Lastly, when I said we have the most bigoted people, I didn't mean numerically. I meant that the United States has the people who are most bigoted out of other societies. Our American society is full of hatred, violence, and discrimination. If you deny that, then you are blind.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 04, 2012, 06:20:53 PM
I do not agree with calling it a civil union for same-sex couples and a marriage for opposite-sex couples because this is treating gays as second class citizens. Marriage is NOT solely a religious institution. It is, first and foremost, a state institution. People get married for state benefits. The first marriages in ancient civilizations had nothing to do with religion. That is why I don't agree with it.

You are not a qualified scientists. Qualified scientists will tell you that homosexuality while not conclusively genetic, is not a defect. You also have a false understanding of natural selection. Your logic is that if it is genetic, it would die off since homosexuals can't naturally reproduce. But that would be assuming that the trait can only be dominant. Two brown-haired parents can have a blonde kid because one (or both) of the parents had the blonde gene, it just wasn't the dominant trait for hair color. Similarly, two straight parents can have a gay kid because one (or both) of the parents have the gay gene, it just wasn't the dominant trait. (That is, of course, assuming it is genetic.)

Hypothetically, however, let's assume it is a defect. Is it your place or even society's place to tell a person what to embrace and what not to embrace? Hell no. If someone's gay (like me) and fine with being gay (like me) and embraces being gay (like me) and wants to lead a happy life with a boyfriend or husband (like me), then that is their choice to embrace their sexuality. It shouldn't matter to you.

Lastly, when I said we have the most bigoted people, I didn't mean numerically. I meant that the United States has the people who are most bigoted out of other societies. Our American society is full of hatred, violence, and discrimination. If you deny that, then you are blind.

There is no proof that the first marriages were either state or religious, we don't have accurate records back then because you'd have to go back further than even the bible, so good luck arguing that point. Religions and the state have always gone hand in hand where marriage is concerned and still do, which you can't even argue since that's one of the major reasons gay marriage has been outlawed so long. That means it should be something else, if you are really only concerned with the state benefits you wouldn't care if it was named civil union and gay unions got all the same state benefits. Its not treating you as second class citizens as you get the same benefits, so you shouldn't care.

There is proof that even recessive genes that hurt the chance of survival enough will die out. If it was indeed a recessive gene then throughout all of history people who got double recessive obviously would not repopulate, and by sheer chance when people with one recessive gay gene reproduced they would still create double dominant. The sheer astronomical odds that a gene even recessive that limits the odds of reproduction that much surviving all of human's history means no "qualified" scientist would claim it to be without definate proof, of which there is none.

Defects mean they are detrimental, therefore they should be eliminated. Once a cure for homosexuality (assuming it is indeed biological) is found, a way to prevent it in new children, it should immediatly be used. It is societies place, and always has been to decide what is correct, that is the entire point of democracy. Why it matters to me is my own buisness just like you don't have to give a reason to be gay, and like I've said, I can judge you if I want.

I would argue your last point, there are societies that are far more intollerant than ours. China for example has a heritage of sexism and discrimination towards different groups. America certainly has its bigots but you really can't say other countries cant' match or surpass us.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: tics on November 04, 2012, 06:32:17 PM
I do not agree with calling it a civil union for same-sex couples and a marriage for opposite-sex couples because this is treating gays as second class citizens. Marriage is NOT solely a religious institution. It is, first and foremost, a state institution. People get married for state benefits. The first marriages in ancient civilizations had nothing to do with religion. That is why I don't agree with it.

You are not a qualified scientists. Qualified scientists will tell you that homosexuality while not conclusively genetic, is not a defect. You also have a false understanding of natural selection. Your logic is that if it is genetic, it would die off since homosexuals can't naturally reproduce. But that would be assuming that the trait can only be dominant. Two brown-haired parents can have a blonde kid because one (or both) of the parents had the blonde gene, it just wasn't the dominant trait for hair color. Similarly, two straight parents can have a gay kid because one (or both) of the parents have the gay gene, it just wasn't the dominant trait. (That is, of course, assuming it is genetic.)

Hypothetically, however, let's assume it is a defect. Is it your place or even society's place to tell a person what to embrace and what not to embrace? Hell no. If someone's gay (like me) and fine with being gay (like me) and embraces being gay (like me) and wants to lead a happy life with a boyfriend or husband (like me), then that is their choice to embrace their sexuality. It shouldn't matter to you.

Lastly, when I said we have the most bigoted people, I didn't mean numerically. I meant that the United States has the people who are most bigoted out of other societies. Our American society is full of hatred, violence, and discrimination. If you deny that, then you are blind.

There is no proof that the first marriages were either state or religious, we don't have accurate records back then because you'd have to go back further than even the bible, so good luck arguing that point. Religions and the state have always gone hand in hand where marriage is concerned and still do, which you can't even argue since that's one of the major reasons gay marriage has been outlawed so long. That means it should be something else, if you are really only concerned with the state benefits you wouldn't care if it was named civil union and gay unions got all the same state benefits. Its not treating you as second class citizens as you get the same benefits, so you shouldn't care.

There is proof that even recessive genes that hurt the chance of survival enough will die out. If it was indeed a recessive gene then throughout all of history people who got double recessive obviously would not repopulate, and by sheer chance when people with one recessive gay gene reproduced they would still create double dominant. The sheer astronomical odds that a gene even recessive that limits the odds of reproduction that much surviving all of human's history means no "qualified" scientist would claim it to be without definate proof, of which there is none.

Defects mean they are detrimental, therefore they should be eliminated. Once a cure for homosexuality (assuming it is indeed biological) is found, a way to prevent it in new children, it should immediatly be used. It is societies place, and always has been to decide what is correct, that is the entire point of democracy. Why it matters to me is my own buisness just like you don't have to give a reason to be gay, and like I've said, I can judge you if I want.

I would argue your last point, there are societies that are far more intollerant than ours. China for example has a heritage of sexism and discrimination towards different groups. America certainly has its bigots but you really can't say other countries cant' match or surpass us.
You're correct in saying that defects are detrimental. Homosexuality is not detrimental though. You won't die because you're homosexual. In this day and age, the inability to reproduce or procreate is not detrimental, as many choose not to. And if you think that the core purpose of democracy is to decide what's right and wrong, then you don't have any good understanding of democracy. The core principle of democracy is upholding personal freedoms, i.e. the personal freedom to choose how to lead your life. Also, hypothetically if your false understanding of democracy's purpose was true, the majority of Americans believe that homosexuality is not wrong, and therefore the choice of society would be that people should embrace it.

You ought to research natural selection more, because your understanding of it is poor. Many qualified scientists actually do agree with exactly what I said.

Lastly, I actually did give a reason for me being gay. Scientifically, certain circumstances (whether they be genetic or from experience or any others) have made me have a more dominant attraction to males than females. So don't try to give me this crap that your intolerance and bigotry does not need a reason. You're essentially saying, "I can hate homosexuality because I can." Well, no shit Sherlock. Also, most people who argue on your side of aisle as vehemently as you are either a) religious, bible-thumping extremists, b) homosexuals who cannot accept who they are, and therefore hate others, or c) poorly educated people. Which one are you?

I've made my point here. I don't intend on posting further. Goodbye.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Mr Jive on November 04, 2012, 06:44:33 PM
Disliking homosexuality isn't even really a personal opinion, you are not born hating them in the same way that you are not born straight or gay your views are put forward by the society around you. As an individual growing up the majority of your opinions are based around what is the norm in your society and so it is only logical that many people in America would dislike Gay people. They follow the Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism, Islam etc.) and these religions specifically say that homosexuality is bad, among over things and so in societies based off these beliefs there will be hatred towards these people. But it is in no manner the norm because these are pretty much the only religions that follow this belief system so strictly. In many other societies not defined by these beliefs, throughout time, homosexuality is not even thought of as an issue, it isn't even a thing because it is so normal.

For example in Ancient Greece Beauty was not gender specific, which is why there is paintings and statues of both beautiful men and women. In ancient Rome it was common for many men to be Bi-sexual, many emperors would have a wife for political reasons and to reproduce but they would also have sexual intercourse with men as well, for pleasure and intimacy. Hadrian famously had a male lover who he loved even more so then his own wife, and when that lover died he erected many statues in the memory of that man. My point is that homosexuality is in fact the norm throughout Human history, it is Christianity (and the other beliefs) that are abnormal. It is our western viewpoint that we have tainted on the rest of the world that is wrong and that is bizarre. In most other cultures past and present that are not subject to Abrahamic beliefs homosexuality is often accepted.

Which leads onto my second point, I do not understand the need for Gay marriage. I myself am Bisexual and I would never want to get married in a church or anything like that, however I do believe that the benefits of marriage should be available to anyone, which is why we have civil partnerships. If a religion says something that you disagree with you should not try to change it, you should accept it as wrong and find a new religion. I do not want to be married under a religion that disagrees with my opinion, but that doesn’t mean I don't mind having a religion marriage, if it was part of a religion that is accepting of what I am doing.

I also believe that it is not in our right to change a religions rule because we disagree with them; it makes more sense to ignore that religion for its views are warped and wrong. Take the Ku Klux Klan, their views are wrong and I strongly disagree with everything they stand for. That doesn’t mean I should try to change them so that I can be part of the KKK, it means they are wrong and I shouldn't let that continue/associate myself with it. But this is just my opinion, if you really want to stick to your beliefs despite what they say and think they can change then go-ahead, but I think the more rational choice is to accept it is wrong and leave it behind.

To sum up though, there is nothing wrong with homosexuality and people should be allowed to love as they please, but we should not be allowed to change people’s rules and opinions to fit our own. And at the same time I must respect anyone’s opinion and anyone who disagrees with what I have said.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 04, 2012, 06:50:16 PM
You're correct in saying that defects are detrimental. Homosexuality is not detrimental though. You won't die because you're homosexual. In this day and age, the inability to reproduce or procreate is not detrimental, as many choose not to. And if you think that the core purpose of democracy is to decide what's right and wrong, then you don't have any good understanding of democracy. The core principle of democracy is upholding personal freedoms, i.e. the personal freedom to choose how to lead your life. Also, hypothetically if your false understanding of democracy's purpose was true, the majority of Americans believe that homosexuality is not wrong, and therefore the choice of society would be that people should embrace it.

You ought to research natural selection more, because your understanding of it is poor. Many qualified scientists actually do agree with exactly what I said.

Lastly, I actually did give a reason for me being gay. Scientifically, certain circumstances (whether they be genetic or from experience or any others) have made me have a more dominant attraction to males than females. So don't try to give me this crap that your intolerance and bigotry does not need a reason. You're essentially saying, "I can hate homosexuality because I can." Well, no shit Sherlock. Also, most people who argue on your side of aisle as vehemently as you are either a) religious, bible-thumping extremists, b) homosexuals who cannot accept who they are, and therefore hate others, or c) poorly educated people. Which one are you?

I've made my point here. I don't intend on posting further. Goodbye.

Ah, but hasen't homosexuality caused a division in even this day and  age? Wouldn't the world be better off is scientist started insuring that homosexual children are corrected before birth? It would discontinue this arguing and the children would be no worse off for it. If it is a defect caused by complications durring birth then it is not supposed to happen and should be crushed. I was merely saying that the reason we all love democracy is it allows society to govern what is right and wrong, isn't that the entire point? Democracy at its truest form is saying that the majority knows best, no matter how uneducated and stupid they may be. The constitution is what upholds personal freedoms you fool, democracy only cares about the whole, not the individual.

In regards to natural selection, just as many scientists would agree with what I've said, otherwise your theory would be law, not theory.

My "intolerance and bigotry" does have a reason, but yes, my point was that even if I didn't, I don't need a reason to hate gay people. Also, I'm not exactly arguing vehemently, I quite enjoy this friendly little conversation we're having. Out of the three options you've given me the closest one would have to be A I guess, although none really fit me. If we are going to go by steryotypes, you are a homosexual aren't you? Are you A) A sex driven psycho that will fuck any male with a pulse, B) a flamboyant peacock with an over inflated sense of self importance, C) A homosexual who only came out of the closet so he could whine and moan about how unfair life is to his kind, or D) Some pumped up macho who hangs out in gay bars 24/7 and never does anything with his life?

I think I've made my point, although I may or may not post in the future if necessary, I do so enjoy a good debate. Goodbye for now then.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: tics on November 04, 2012, 06:52:50 PM
Disliking homosexuality isn't even really a personal opinion, you are not born hating them in the same way that you are not born straight or gay your views are put forward by the society around you. As an individual growing up the majority of your opinions are based around what is the norm in your society and so it is only logical that many people in America would dislike Gay people. They follow the Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism, Islam etc.) and these religions specifically say that homosexuality is bad, among over things and so in societies based off these beliefs there will be hatred towards these people. But it is in no manner the norm because these are pretty much the only religions that follow this belief system so strictly. In many other societies not defined by these beliefs, throughout time, homosexuality is not even thought of as an issue, it isn't even a thing because it is so normal.

For example in Ancient Greece Beauty was not gender specific, which is why there is paintings and statues of both beautiful men and women. In ancient Rome it was common for many men to be Bi-sexual, many emperors would have a wife for political reasons and to reproduce but they would also have sexual intercourse with men as well, for pleasure and intimacy. Hadrian famously had a male lover who he loved even more so then his own wife, and when that lover died he erected many statues in the memory of that man. My point is that homosexuality is in fact the norm throughout Human history, it is Christianity (and the other beliefs) that are abnormal. It is our western viewpoint that we have tainted on the rest of the world that is wrong and that is bizarre. In most other cultures past and present that are not subject to Abrahamic beliefs homosexuality is often accepted.

Which leads onto my second point, I do not understand the need for Gay marriage. I myself am Bisexual and I would never want to get married in a church or anything like that, however I do believe that the benefits of marriage should be available to anyone, which is why we have civil partnerships. If a religion says something that you disagree with you should not try to change it, you should accept it as wrong and find a new religion. I do not want to be married under a religion that disagrees with my opinion, but that doesn’t mean I don't mind having a religion marriage, if it was part of a religion that is accepting of what I am doing.

I also believe that it is not in our right to change a religions rule because we disagree with them; it makes more sense to ignore that religion for its views are warped and wrong. Take the Ku Klux Klan, their views are wrong and I strongly disagree with everything they stand for. That doesn’t mean I should try to change them so that I can be part of the KKK, it means they are wrong and I shouldn't let that continue/associate myself with it. But this is just my opinion, if you really want to stick to your beliefs despite what they say and think they can change then go-ahead, but I think the more rational choice is to accept it is wrong and leave it behind.

To sum up though, there is nothing wrong with homosexuality and people should be allowed to love as they please, but we should not be allowed to change people’s rules and opinions to fit our own. And at the same time I must respect anyone’s opinion and anyone who disagrees with what I have said.
Except that the governing churches of Christianity and Judaism haven't actually put out any particular opinions, and it's actually not so clear cut.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezQjNJUSraY

Post Auto-Merged: November 04, 2012, 06:55:11 PM
You're correct in saying that defects are detrimental. Homosexuality is not detrimental though. You won't die because you're homosexual. In this day and age, the inability to reproduce or procreate is not detrimental, as many choose not to. And if you think that the core purpose of democracy is to decide what's right and wrong, then you don't have any good understanding of democracy. The core principle of democracy is upholding personal freedoms, i.e. the personal freedom to choose how to lead your life. Also, hypothetically if your false understanding of democracy's purpose was true, the majority of Americans believe that homosexuality is not wrong, and therefore the choice of society would be that people should embrace it.

You ought to research natural selection more, because your understanding of it is poor. Many qualified scientists actually do agree with exactly what I said.

Lastly, I actually did give a reason for me being gay. Scientifically, certain circumstances (whether they be genetic or from experience or any others) have made me have a more dominant attraction to males than females. So don't try to give me this crap that your intolerance and bigotry does not need a reason. You're essentially saying, "I can hate homosexuality because I can." Well, no shit Sherlock. Also, most people who argue on your side of aisle as vehemently as you are either a) religious, bible-thumping extremists, b) homosexuals who cannot accept who they are, and therefore hate others, or c) poorly educated people. Which one are you?

I've made my point here. I don't intend on posting further. Goodbye.

Ah, but hasen't homosexuality caused a division in even this day and  age? Wouldn't the world be better off is scientist started insuring that homosexual children are corrected before birth? It would discontinue this arguing and the children would be no worse off for it. If it is a defect caused by complications durring birth then it is not supposed to happen and should be crushed. I was merely saying that the reason we all love democracy is it allows society to govern what is right and wrong, isn't that the entire point? Democracy at its truest form is saying that the majority knows best, no matter how uneducated and stupid they may be. The constitution is what upholds personal freedoms you fool, democracy only cares about the whole, not the individual.

In regards to natural selection, just as many scientists would agree with what I've said, otherwise your theory would be law, not theory.

My "intolerance and bigotry" does have a reason, but yes, my point was that even if I didn't, I don't need a reason to hate gay people. Also, I'm not exactly arguing vehemently, I quite enjoy this friendly little conversation we're having. Out of the three options you've given me the closest one would have to be A I guess, although none really fit me. If we are going to go by steryotypes, you are a homosexual aren't you? Are you A) A sex driven psycho that will fuck any male with a pulse, B) a flamboyant peacock with an over inflated sense of self importance, C) A homosexual who only came out of the closet so he could whine and moan about how unfair life is to his kind, or D) Some pumped up macho who hangs out in gay bars 24/7 and never does anything with his life?

I think I've made my point, although I may or may not post in the future if necessary, I do so enjoy a good debate. Goodbye for now then.
Answer me this: Do you believe everything in nature happens for a reason? I'm not necessarily saying with homosexual humans, just in general, do you believe everything in nature happens for a reason?
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Mr Jive on November 04, 2012, 07:01:32 PM
Disliking homosexuality isn't even really a personal opinion, you are not born hating them in the same way that you are not born straight or gay your views are put forward by the society around you. As an individual growing up the majority of your opinions are based around what is the norm in your society and so it is only logical that many people in America would dislike Gay people. They follow the Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism, Islam etc.) and these religions specifically say that homosexuality is bad, among over things and so in societies based off these beliefs there will be hatred towards these people. But it is in no manner the norm because these are pretty much the only religions that follow this belief system so strictly. In many other societies not defined by these beliefs, throughout time, homosexuality is not even thought of as an issue, it isn't even a thing because it is so normal.

For example in Ancient Greece Beauty was not gender specific, which is why there is paintings and statues of both beautiful men and women. In ancient Rome it was common for many men to be Bi-sexual, many emperors would have a wife for political reasons and to reproduce but they would also have sexual intercourse with men as well, for pleasure and intimacy. Hadrian famously had a male lover who he loved even more so then his own wife, and when that lover died he erected many statues in the memory of that man. My point is that homosexuality is in fact the norm throughout Human history, it is Christianity (and the other beliefs) that are abnormal. It is our western viewpoint that we have tainted on the rest of the world that is wrong and that is bizarre. In most other cultures past and present that are not subject to Abrahamic beliefs homosexuality is often accepted.

Which leads onto my second point, I do not understand the need for Gay marriage. I myself am Bisexual and I would never want to get married in a church or anything like that, however I do believe that the benefits of marriage should be available to anyone, which is why we have civil partnerships. If a religion says something that you disagree with you should not try to change it, you should accept it as wrong and find a new religion. I do not want to be married under a religion that disagrees with my opinion, but that doesn’t mean I don't mind having a religion marriage, if it was part of a religion that is accepting of what I am doing.

I also believe that it is not in our right to change a religions rule because we disagree with them; it makes more sense to ignore that religion for its views are warped and wrong. Take the Ku Klux Klan, their views are wrong and I strongly disagree with everything they stand for. That doesn’t mean I should try to change them so that I can be part of the KKK, it means they are wrong and I shouldn't let that continue/associate myself with it. But this is just my opinion, if you really want to stick to your beliefs despite what they say and think they can change then go-ahead, but I think the more rational choice is to accept it is wrong and leave it behind.

To sum up though, there is nothing wrong with homosexuality and people should be allowed to love as they please, but we should not be allowed to change people’s rules and opinions to fit our own. And at the same time I must respect anyone’s opinion and anyone who disagrees with what I have said.
Except that the governing churches of Christianity and Judaism haven't actually put out any particular opinions, and it's actually not so clear cut.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezQjNJUSraY

Post Auto-Merged: November 04, 2012, 06:55:11 PM

This is very true, but my point is there is a definite correlation between nations founded on the Abrahamic religions and a negative opinion on homosexuals. And I do not want to insuate that the vatican, the Church of England or anyone other religious organisation is so clear cut on the matter, as it is with many matters that are considerd complicated for them (such as abortion, contreception, IVF etc)
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 04, 2012, 07:06:04 PM
Depends on what you mean by reason Nik. If you mean for some higher purpose, no I don't. If you mean cause and effect, as in it happened because somethign caused it, then yeah sure.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: garry :D on November 04, 2012, 08:17:18 PM
Quote
I judge who I want to judge.

I thought God's children weren't supposed to judge others?
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 04, 2012, 08:36:23 PM
Quote
I judge who I want to judge.

I thought God's children weren't supposed to judge others?

I REALLY wish people would read all my comments before responding to me. I may believe in God, but I put almost no stock whatsoever in the bible. That being said, arguing for religion whether God said not to judge others or not, there are plenty of examples in the bible of his desciples and prophets and others judging and executing others in his name. Moses for example ordered the murder of all the men in a village and the rape of all the women because they stood against his people. The bible is full of contradictions, Christians are just like the terrorists who missinterpret the Quaran's messages in the fact they pick and choose which examples they choose to follow. The bible can range from telling people to never lift a hand against anyone to basically telling you to kill pretty much anyone you see.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Pielolz on November 04, 2012, 08:49:51 PM
Quote
I judge who I want to judge.

I thought God's children weren't supposed to judge others?

I REALLY wish people would read all my comments before responding to me. I may believe in God, but I put almost no stock whatsoever in the bible. That being said, arguing for religion whether God said not to judge others or not, there are plenty of examples in the bible of his desciples and prophets and others judging and executing others in his name. Moses for example ordered the murder of all the men in a village and the rape of all the women because they stood against his people. The bible is full of contradictions, Christians are just like the terrorists who missinterpret the Quaran's messages in the fact they pick and choose which examples they choose to follow. The bible can range from telling people to never lift a hand against anyone to basically telling you to kill pretty much anyone you see.



You once said "Correct before birth" God makes EVERYTHING and EVERYONE perfectly and in His image, do you dare disagree with the Will of God? Whom are you to correct His creation, claiming that it is wrong and imperfect?

Those are the words of a heretic, that you have spoken
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: GamingZealot on November 04, 2012, 09:01:38 PM
Quote
I judge who I want to judge.

I thought God's children weren't supposed to judge others?

I REALLY wish people would read all my comments before responding to me. I may believe in God, but I put almost no stock whatsoever in the bible. That being said, arguing for religion whether God said not to judge others or not, there are plenty of examples in the bible of his desciples and prophets and others judging and executing others in his name. Moses for example ordered the murder of all the men in a village and the rape of all the women because they stood against his people. The bible is full of contradictions, Christians are just like the terrorists who missinterpret the Quaran's messages in the fact they pick and choose which examples they choose to follow. The bible can range from telling people to never lift a hand against anyone to basically telling you to kill pretty much anyone you see.



You once said "Correct before birth" God makes EVERYTHING and EVERYONE perfectly and in His image, do you dare disagree with the Will of God? Whom are you to correct His creation, claiming that it is wrong and imperfect?

Those are the words of a heretic, that you have spoken

Seriously, the hell have you been doing if you haven't been reading my posts. You said something to that effect earlier and I will tell you the same thing I told you then. God created us in his image IN THE FACT that we are human. Not in our individual looks, minds, or most importantly to this argument, defects. God did not make everyone perfect, not at all. If you knew anything about religion you would know this.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Anzu on November 05, 2012, 08:58:03 AM
I agree with Redrum, this thread is nothing but two or three people repeating themselves making gradually longer posts.

Please change the discussion, so that we dont end up in a page full of a few people bashing religion or others opinion.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: wakeboarderCWB on November 05, 2012, 10:32:36 AM
Note: I haven't read a single post in this thread other than the original. This is my view, in no response to anyone else.

I'm a Christian, so I don't support gay marriage and I don't think it should be legal or practiced. Does that mean I go to rallies and threaten people who are gay? No, I don't. I also don't judge anyone or think any less of them, because that's not my job or why I'm here in this world. Does that mean I seek out gays and try to force my views and religion on them? No, I don't. If they were to ask my view on it, I would tell them, however. I stay to myself and live my life how I want to live it, which just so happens to be influenced by my Christian religion. Who am I to tell someone else how to live their life, when I obviously wouldn't want someone telling me how? That's just how I see it.
This is well said, Airborne, and I agree with you 100%.

When I get asked my opinion on same sex marriage, I give it to them. If it's not what they want to hear, 90% of the time they will flip out on me. Why? This is my first time telling you, and you asked for it. I'm not going to lie to someone about my opinions.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: LG-IM.Swagger on November 05, 2012, 11:42:31 AM
In my opinion, every human being's mind is perverted one way to another (this doesn't mean it's bad) When we have an sexual attraction to someone (or something) Is uh.. shit let me just give an example: If  male 1 is attracted to  male 2 because of let's say we call this attraction:A. In male's 1 mind is attracted by people with A, and let's say this attraction would be Male only, then in this case Male 1 would be attracted to Male 2. It's the same thing with Male being attracted to Female. (I think i made it more confusing but w/e)

I don't agree with Homosexuality but that doesn't it should be against the law, because it's a person's choice. As human beings our minds are perverted but some minds are more than others.

Now for the "Oh we were born that way." Is bullshit. If that were the case human beings would be able to produce no matter what the sex was. For example: Since Pedophilia is an sexual attraction (and an disorder) then why are they arrested if doctors considered this as a disorder? Wouldn't there be ways of keeping it to a minimum? Like autism for example, if we see symptoms at the first signs like: Unable to speak (My brother has autism and he couldn't speak until a the age of 4.), sameness, stacking. Then It can be treated with mental help. But it's an sexual attraction, so it would be the same thing as my example, it can be the same thing with other crimes that let's say Person A was going to rob Person B, this is a thought created by Person A because of something Person B owns.

TL;DR: All Sexual orientations and fetishes are all in perspective of one's mind, in this case we are all bisexuals.
How could it not be a choice? I couldn't bring myself to like dick in my ass and I'm sure a gay guy would find vagina repulsive. It's not like people wake up one day and think "I WANT TO GET FUCKED IN THE ASS BY 30 MEN AT THE SAME TIME"

Fact of the matter is Rofl, the bicurious stage in life is the most volatile stage for a boy/girl, it's perhaps a very hormonic state in which anything could happen, I'm sure Crap-Head can be used as an example, as over the time I haven't been in the community, he let the beat drop (voice) and suddenly he sounds 14 1/2 instead of 12. ( ;) ) Frankly, sometimes it will come to a point and you'll somehow grow a fetish towards it, like chicks with dicks, or hotwings with dicks, this thread is full of dumb anyway, frankly because no matter what the argument is, the right way is the biological way, and that's to just let nature strip naked and throw the closet out and dance naked down Birmingham City Center.

Sabotage
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: Keskjer on November 05, 2012, 02:09:42 PM
My opinion is: you want to suck dick, fine. Just don't go waving it around at people and shoving it down there throats.
As for two females. Go for it.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: LG-IM.Swagger on November 05, 2012, 02:39:18 PM
My opinion is: you want to suck dick, fine. Just don't go waving it around at people and shoving it down there throats.
As for two females. Go for it.

I see what you did there.
Title: Re: Same sex marriage
Post by: FanaticWarren on November 05, 2012, 06:07:54 PM
This is turning going to turn into a bunch of flame and retarded opinions which people should be keeping to them selves.

Locking.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal