Catalyst Gaming

General => Suggestions => Topic started by: wag1 on February 20, 2014, 08:15:56 PM

Title: rez spam
Post by: wag1 on February 20, 2014, 08:15:56 PM
add more rules:

1. dont target members of cg with flame



and we good spams back
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: wakeboarderCWB on February 20, 2014, 08:25:18 PM
As long as it's being used for what spam is supposed to be used for, I support it. Random pictures, forum games, etc.
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: smt on February 20, 2014, 08:31:51 PM
As long as it's being used for what spam is supposed to be used for, I support it. Random pictures, forum games, etc.

no, make it be free, if we really must, then make it so people can't post "flame" or "abuse" or otherwise offensive to SPECIFIC people that is clearly not a joke

but if i want ot make a thread called "wakeboarder is a nigger" then in the thread is just "he is a nigger" then that should be allowed because that's pretty much allowed in the shoutbox, the spam should just be an expansion of the shoutbox with dumb posts allowed, sure encourage people to doforum games btu if i want to post an image with some bullshit text under it hen let me do it, it doesn't hurt anyone, it's funny and people enjoyed that kind of shit
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: wag1 on February 20, 2014, 08:34:40 PM
im with both of you here...

spam shouldnt be like posting peoples facebook accoutns and laughing at them or legit ganging up on some guy and everybody flame / make fun of him
 
spam should be just fuckery in general
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Hazard Time on February 20, 2014, 08:37:18 PM
If we're going to have spam back with the rule against flaming, it needs to be explicitly defined.  It goes without saying that hogs isn't the only person on the internet who purposefully seeks and exploits the shit out of extant loopholes.

EDIT:  Here's a possible rough draft of such a rule:  "Spam threads directly disparaging other member(s) of the community will not be tolerated."  Obviously it's only a first draft, so I would like some criticism as to how we can word this rule to include "disparaging" threads that are made without any hostile intention (wakeboarder is a nigger).
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: wag1 on February 20, 2014, 08:59:46 PM
im tellin u we wouldnt have this problem if erybody was high mang dude
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: smt on February 20, 2014, 09:01:27 PM
if we really must have rules to prevent people taking unserious threads seriously, then can we at least have the clever/non baby admins judge when its just a joke?? because flaming as a joke is pretty funny (and is pretty much what 99% of old spam flame was anyway)
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: wag1 on February 20, 2014, 09:04:11 PM
if we really must have rules to prevent people taking unserious threads seriously, then can we at least have the clever/non baby admins judge when its just a joke?? because flaming as a joke is pretty funny (and is pretty much what 99% of old spam flame was anyway)

yeah before just jumping to the conclusion "oh that fucker is being 100% serious, and I should ban him before thinking or asking him about the situation and making the right decision" actually look into it ask the dude if hes joking or not

Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Hazard Time on February 20, 2014, 09:16:47 PM
"Posting a thread in Spam directly disparaging other member(s) of the community with hostile intent will result in a warning and/or forum ban."

I think that's a considerable edit.
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Bish on February 20, 2014, 10:21:19 PM
Please... make being a grammar Nazi in these things verboten.  It's just plain annoying and is practically flaming.
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: smt on February 20, 2014, 10:32:51 PM
Please... make being a grammar Nazi in these things verboten.  It's just plain annoying and is practically flaming.

spam isnt serious  and posts dont count so no grammar wouldnt be expected
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Bish on February 20, 2014, 10:41:35 PM
Please... make being a grammar Nazi in these things verboten.  It's just plain annoying and is practically flaming.

spam isnt serious  and posts dont count so no grammar wouldnt be expected
Yes true.  But people still do that grammar crap... it gets really annoying.
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Hazard Time on February 20, 2014, 10:55:57 PM
Yes true.  But people still do that grammar crap... it gets really annoying.

And this is the reason Spam was removed in the first place...

If people can't learn to deal with simple trolling like this, then I don't want to know what happens when Abbott starts posting his octoporn again...



Or my pony pics
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Bish on February 20, 2014, 10:59:03 PM
Yes true.  But people still do that grammar crap... it gets really annoying.

And this is the reason Spam was removed in the first place...

If people can't learn to deal with simple trolling like this, then I don't want to know what happens when Abbott starts posting his octoporn again...




Or my pony pics
Oh gawd dat pron... lol. I would not mind a spam folder... as long as there is no flaming.
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Cat With A Mustache on February 21, 2014, 12:30:42 AM
I have to say, spam was probably the most fun thread to read, since it was just a bunch of shit piled into one. Although some were really stupid (Mostly horror porn things), I loved it. SPAM 2014
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: wag1 on February 21, 2014, 01:04:04 AM
im guessing a vast majority would like to see spam (of cg [?])

Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Somone77 on February 21, 2014, 02:14:21 AM
>>/b/ (http://boards.4chan.org/b/)
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Teitoku Ippan on February 21, 2014, 05:22:09 AM
yes the master of spam must have his natural habitat returned with rules like not using it to flame directly etc

all hail the octopus
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Constable Strelnikov on February 21, 2014, 08:58:05 AM
I wasn't around for enough of spam to really relate to this thread, but I can support a spam rez.
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Yak on February 28, 2014, 01:29:42 AM
the domain of the australians
more of the fact admins were getting buttblasted cause we could say anything
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: BltElite on February 28, 2014, 02:04:03 AM
As long as its monitpredby a couple admins who won't get butthurt easily and can tell when its targeted flaming on a scale I don't see a problem with it
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Channy on February 28, 2014, 03:33:10 AM
So a spam thread with a few rules to prevent flaming and stupid behavior such as posting personal FB profiles n shit. Is there any reason this new spam shouldn't happen?
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Hazard Time on February 28, 2014, 03:57:44 AM
Is there any reason this new spam shouldn't happen?

No logical reason, but I'm sure someone will come up with something.












summon forth the octoporn and pony pics
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Tyrex on February 28, 2014, 02:39:55 PM
make abbott spam leader / moderator
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Hazard Time on February 28, 2014, 03:03:51 PM
make abbott spam leader / moderator

While we're at it, let's make Statua head of HL2RP.












ANARCHY
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: smt on February 28, 2014, 03:54:18 PM
make abbott spam leader / moderator

While we're at it, let's make Statua head of HL2RP.












ANARCHY

(http://i.imgur.com/pchV77l.png)
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Statua on February 28, 2014, 03:57:15 PM
make abbott spam leader / moderator

While we're at it, let's make Statua head of HL2RP.












ANARCHY
I like that idea. Can we also make smt CG owner and find SatN to make him SeC?
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Teitoku Ippan on February 28, 2014, 04:15:58 PM
make abbott spam leader / moderator

While we're at it, let's make Statua head of HL2RP.












ANARCHY
I like that idea. Can we also make smt CG owner and find SatN to make him SeC?

very approved
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Jeff2307 on February 28, 2014, 04:16:15 PM
and maybe we can make Nicknero queen of the Netherlands to?
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Teitoku Ippan on February 28, 2014, 04:18:33 PM
and maybe we can make Nicknero queen of the Netherlands faggots to?

but thats already true
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: alaskan thunderfuck on February 28, 2014, 07:16:16 PM
We'll see how HL2RP goes. Spam was a major source of drama, and while I don't have an issue with bringing it back to see how it goes, I'm not gonna bring back two things that caused problems at the same time.
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Teitoku Ippan on February 28, 2014, 07:22:11 PM
We'll see how HL2RP goes. Spam was a major source of drama, and while I don't have an issue with bringing it back to see how it goes, I'm not gonna bring back two things that caused problems at the same time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_VheAwZBuQ

praise the spam!
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Yak on March 01, 2014, 04:15:46 AM
spam tier list coming soon
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: alaskan thunderfuck on March 01, 2014, 04:42:24 AM
We'll see how HL2RP goes. Spam was a major source of drama, and while I don't have an issue with bringing it back to see how it goes, I'm not gonna bring back two things that caused problems at the same time.
Nevermind. It's back up, be sure to read the rules. People using spam as a tool to create drama will be banned without warning and if it gets out of hand I'll just remove it again.
Title: Re: rez spam
Post by: Statua on March 01, 2014, 11:06:55 AM
Could it be made again that spam posts don't show up in the view unread list? I like spam. Just not when it pushes all the other stuff out of the way.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal