This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - [LP]GMK-MRL
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 25
61
« on: March 31, 2013, 11:44:32 AM »
I took some time to think about it and applied some of my headcrab knowledge to the story and it is plausable for a headcrab to attach to another lifeform as you have previously stated that headcrabs aren't just made for humans as it takes many years for that biological change to even take place.
Also I like your story......talk to your family some time reaver.
+Support
62
« on: March 30, 2013, 03:05:55 PM »
Please mount CSS and Day of Defeat Source.
63
« on: March 29, 2013, 03:08:11 PM »
Well written and this could not only provide a reason for your supplies, but for others as well. I.E: Dark Chapel leaves someone a crate and they can use their v flags to obtain it. It doesn't have to be from Dark Chapel, but it is a good source of a background for people who are traders.
So ye. +support
64
« on: March 29, 2013, 01:41:13 PM »
Soon after running from authorities the Union invaded. He showed no signs of insanity so he was released into the cities. People don't usually just lose a mental illness and stop showing signs if they had just aquired it, certainly if no medications were taken. So in that case, it would be just pure shock and mental scarring. He remembers the words of his many masters. When did you meet these masters and how did you manage to meet them? Mental defects- Schizophrenia
Post traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Agoraphobia
Schizotypal
Pyromania And you have a katana? I have an immense feeling that this character containing this authorization app might go a little crazy with that weapon. But I could be proven wrong. He could just slash at the shadows. Throughout his quest he had seen many things that would have made any normal man go ballistic and kill those around him. From those diseases and mental illnesses listed up there, I think this character would go ballistic if someone bumped into him. One hold a shank and the other a black sword which appeared to be a Katana. This is plausable as it has been done before in the past, but very rare. One would usually not be out in the open body guarding the Grizzly Groto with it. Katana Blade- The blade will give him the ability to protect him any threat, and he will only use it as a tool of defense and intimidation. A Katana is a powerful weapon, but it is for close quarters combat and won't help you against an oppenent who has a long ranged/mid-ranged weapon. Fix these up and you'd have my support. But for now i'll keep it in the neutral zone.
65
« on: March 27, 2013, 06:00:35 PM »
I've seen your RP before and its pretty good. You've been here for awhile and understand the penalties as well.
Just please try to provide a source of your spawned furniture and all that jazz if you can.
Accepted!Locked.Moved.
66
« on: March 24, 2013, 10:05:38 AM »
Count me in as well.
67
« on: March 23, 2013, 10:00:42 PM »
There was no specific process mentioned in HL2 about how Lamarr was de-beaked, thus I left it vague. But in one of the video logs I described it as "The de-clawing of a cat".
Ah, good reasoning. Thank you for the clarification.
68
« on: March 23, 2013, 12:49:47 PM »
An interesting read I must say. It looks really good Sexy Frog.
It doesn't really trail into nonsense and it keeps on track, also it stays close to HL canon which is awesome.
My only question is how did the two get de-beaked.
But still. I'll give my +support because I know you can handle this.
69
« on: March 20, 2013, 08:53:09 PM »
Alright, from overviewing your RP, I can fully vouch for you and say that you're a great RP'er. Remember to involve as much RP as possible when using TT.
If you abuse these flags they can and will be removed.
Stay true to your word.
Accepted.Locked.Moved.
70
« on: March 20, 2013, 04:49:40 PM »
No one knows how it feels, until it happened to them.
Everyone becomes serious, when someone close to them dies due to this.
A mother kills herself due to bullying. It happenes. Just because its not in the news, doesn't mean it never happenes. And this can really affect the person who has no full understanding of bullying.
Sometimes, the bullys are the bullied. Fighting them will only make it worse down the road and could possibly cause you to throw your life away.
Fights don't always happen in school and in the streets, you don't get expelled.
You go to jail for Assualt, or you go to the hospital if you lose. Or you could end up dying.
Fighting over a name is silly really. If talking won't help, then the best you could do is sit down and think.
If people are really taking their own time to make fun of you and not focus on themselves, then they're already killing themselves. What will they have in the future? The names they called you and the memories of your suffering will be all they have while they sit on the side of the road.
71
« on: March 18, 2013, 10:49:24 PM »
Maybe if the Nexus door was some how.....blocked off...and the toxic chemicals blocked off the other exits....then the Citizens would most likely be on their own....and the train could be full of posion headcrabs OR malfunctioning OTA units (If those exists)
72
« on: March 11, 2013, 11:54:45 PM »
I really dont know who to vouch for here.
One side of me says deny the appeal. The RP scenario was played out in depth and SA's should have good judgement of things so there's no reason to unpk them. The players properly played through the scenario. But did anyone decide to check if any of the members were auth'd for a buff? Regardless, that was never pointed out and Kronos won fair and square.
Another side says to unpk and void the situation as I really dont want items which were obtained through authorizations to other people who are otherwise unauthorized to use said items. The fact they killed 2 key outlanders simply for their stuff also adds to this.
So I don't know what to choose from without anyone being butthurt.
And sexy, you're right but really, have you seen any hostile vorts in HL2? They talk to eachother with vortessence and wouldnt let this happen. How did your vort break free from the vortessence? If so, wouldnt that make him lose his abilities as a vort? I know it was never brought up but now that theres a problem, there needs to be legit reasoning behind it. This is why auths were created in the first place...
Another side says to unpk and void the situation as I really dont want items which were obtained through authorizations to other people who are otherwise unauthorized to use said items. The fact they killed 2 key outlanders simply for their stuff also adds to this.
Its like everyone is avoiding the fact that I gave four reasons and four counters to give even further reasons for those reasons to be implemented. It was not purely for items. If it was, they would've lived. They just would've lived with out their items.
73
« on: March 11, 2013, 11:40:25 PM »
The group itself was already quite armed as we could both see during the attack itself. All of you had weapons in some form or another (Except for misty if i remember correctly). Weapons which were not small either mind you. The extra weapons from oldman and skyler are overkill to say the very least.
We're not trying to halt your RP because it's sacred ground, but because clearly there's more to this than simply rp, bordering greed for items and what clearly is malice against certain players. Nobody owns outlands but it's not a chaotic mess either. Agreements are made, organizations exist, and these can't simply be overriden by ooc means to fool people into a trap.
A majority does not mean they're right. If you were stuck on an island with two lunatics, and they voted to cook you slowly with a roast-side of coconut, would you agree with it and call it an excellent idea?.
We're not trying to halt your RP because it's sacred ground, but because clearly there's more to this than simply rp, bordering greed for items and what clearly is malice against certain players. Nobody owns outlands but it's not a chaotic mess either. Agreements are made, organizations exist, and these can't simply be overriden by ooc means to fool people into a trap.
So what you're basically saying is....The inn is not a passive RP refugee sanctuary. Everyone should work together and be happy no matter what, and I metagamed to get you killed. No. The Inn is an unownable area. Not a Passive RP sanctuary. The whole outlands can prove to be a Passive RP sanctuary. Not everyone should work together to stop disorganziation. We can be organized in our own ways in our on cliques. And for the last time, this is the last time I will say it, I did not metagame. A majority does not mean they're right. If you were stuck on an island with two lunatics, and they voted to cook you slowly with a roast-side of coconut, would you agree with it and call it an excellent idea?. Okay, so if the majority rules that you should be pk'd, then I'm still wrong and you will always be right. I disagree with that. And i'm such a democrat, that I do believe if the majority rules something, then the majority wants that one thing. The whole decision shouldn't be made by three people. This is what i've been trying to point out. It takes a majority to make a choice. And if they aren't right, who is? Certaintly not you since you weren't even inside of the chat room. You assume i'm metagame. Yet, I didn't. So here i'll provide the def. of assuming. Used for the purpose of argument to indicate a premise on which a statement can be based. Adjective Arrogant or presumptuous. Synonyms arrogant - overweening - conceited - uppish Stop doing these things please. And if you keep causing drama by repeating the same damn thing with different words. It seems like only you, Matt, and Statua are still on this. Everyone else wants to move on including myself. As said before i'm tired of this. And i'm sorry that you lost your character. I really am Eli. It wasn't intended for you. And statua, as an administrator I was hoping to see that you'd try to see it from both sides instead of intensivly looking at mine. As I have given everyone what I could. Please, accept the death. That's all I ask....make some new characters. I mean really guys.
74
« on: March 11, 2013, 11:07:20 PM »
1.) Had resources the group needed.
Your group already has firepower and pretty much is auth'd a vehicle. What more did you need?
2.)Had too much of an ifluencial grip on the Inn that Laurence visited.
The inn is an official unownable passive RP refugee sanctuary. Leave it alone.
3.)Threatened our vortigaunt
Your vortigaunt is corrupt and doesnt follow its race. Does oit even have auths to be that way?
4.)Proved to be hostile towards those who harm others.
So? Did he directly attack you? I don't think that was mentioned.
Honestly, you shouldn't have any information of our group...as it is not released. Unless you're making assumptions, as we gained most of our firepower from silent, who was killed after Old Man. Please do not try to halt my RP because you believe it is a sacred RP ground. You do not own the Outlands. I will leave number three alone as it is out of my answer. He doesn't need to attack me to prove a threat towards the group. A threat isn't a direct attack. A threat most commonly comes before general attacks.. If you're trying to get me for pulling these out of my ass, I will assure you it will not go well. I do believe you're the only administrator who wants these two Unpk'd. Give me some reasons I cant counter.
75
« on: March 11, 2013, 10:01:36 PM »
You provide only repeated (and now anger filled) accusations. Out of that entire rant. You really are just screaming metagame with no valid or physical proof. You're bascially saying i'm wrong, you're right without any proof. It was not scripted, as I've explained before if you would look back. You lied, you misdirected us, you shot us down for no apparent reason other than "supplies" which is not something that's a problem in outlands and misdirected us purposely so we'd break character and have a shot at us. Call me whatever you like, but it'll have to be synonymous to victim.
And if you would read up, I gave four reasons on why I shot Matt. You were collateral and you were only shot due to your presence. Thats your own fault. This isn't simply about the PK, it's about you getting away with abusing the rules and misdirecting honest players to get what you want. From day one of this incident you've changed your story more times than some people change shirts, you've used more circular logic than bloody nuns in catholic school and you've gone out of your way to cloud the facts. The metagame many talk about started with you, and ended with you. I'd really like to know how leading "honest players" to their death's ICly is an OOC crime. My story hasn't changed and I do believe you're becoming flustered over the entire event. Calm down. And when you mean by many, you mainly mean You and Old Man. Greed If you can't get over the fact that my character, (Who I remind you is a past Crip) is going to be greedy, then you must be stuck in denial on how your character has died. They are not supermen. You yourself have stated multiple times that you cannot trust the people in the very group, so why would you go out of your way to give them more shit? you already don't trust them, you do not need them having more firepower to kill you. The influence he had was well isolated to one small part of the map, leaving gigantic parts of the map for you to explore, gain influence over, even seize.
Your vortigaunt is literally eating humans... Why the hell do you trust him? You're right, he doesn't trust them. But that's all he's got. And over time, they will prove to him that he can trust them. So far they've actually grown pretty close due to saving each others life numerous times. My IC story is My IC story. Not yours. I will make it the way I want to as long as it abides by the rules of the community. You have no control over it and I will not let it influence the way Old Man was killed. I've provided numerous accounts of my innocence and you're too clouded by your anger to even think about it. And finally, the hostility could easily come from anyone. I'd dare say even you have more to worry about hostility wise from the other characters in your little group, which you've said over and over on TS and other means that you do not trust and will eventually part away from in an event you people already have planned.
From Laurence's past, he knows those who only strive to protect the innocent will not mix well with him. He knows that those who are practically identical to him, will most likely work with him in a greater aspect. As long as he can provide them with something they all desire, nothing bad will happen. As said before, this is My IC story. You can judge it however you want, but nothing will change until an admin (that I know is not biased) says otherwise.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 25
|
Garry's Mod
Show Posts