Catalyst Gaming

General => Suggestions => Topic started by: rBST Cow on September 18, 2013, 07:21:43 PM

Title: Hm, alright
Post by: rBST Cow on September 18, 2013, 07:21:43 PM
Well since my spam archive idea was shot down, why not make a new board, similar to spam, but with a strict no flaming rule? I think we can all agree that spam without the flaming can still be fun? Don't see how it could be that bad. Just disable gaining post counts and whatnot, pretty much the exact same as spam but with no flaming allowed.
Title: Re: Hm, alright
Post by: wakeboarderCWB on September 18, 2013, 07:33:32 PM
No flaming, posting threads about players without their permission, and no giving out personal information of other members. Spam should be about forum games, post pictures of whatever, 3 word story topics, etc.
Title: Re: Hm, alright
Post by: Teitoku Ippan on September 18, 2013, 07:36:56 PM
No flaming, posting threads about players without their permission, and no giving out personal information of other members. Spam should be about forum games, post pictures of whatever, 3 word story topics, etc.

i think leaking personal info wasnt allowed on spam in the first place, flaming is obvious but threads about players should be limited to banter and not need permission
Title: Re: Hm, alright
Post by: Remilia Scarlet on September 18, 2013, 07:50:11 PM
I second this idea.
Title: Re: Hm, alright
Post by: Statua on September 19, 2013, 12:25:34 AM
So like random shit like back in the day? I would enjoy seeing that again.
Title: Re: Hm, alright
Post by: Nicknero on September 19, 2013, 01:08:06 AM
Nothing wrong against spam as it was before all the rules got removed. As long as it doest go out of hand again.

<::[[ Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S2 using Tapatalk 2 ]]::>
Title: Re: Hm, alright
Post by: rBST Cow on September 19, 2013, 01:19:26 AM
Nothing wrong against spam as it was before all the rules got removed. As long as it doest go out of hand again.

<::[[ Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S2 using Tapatalk 2 ]]::>

Ban the people who flame, since the "new spam" would have a rule against flaming. Simple.
Title: Re: Hm, alright
Post by: Tyrion The Anal Explorer on September 19, 2013, 02:27:24 AM
Good idea sounds pretty good

+Support
Title: Re: Hm, alright
Post by: Hazard Time on September 19, 2013, 03:21:53 AM
All up to Rofl, but I do believe a regulated revival of Spam could work.
Title: Re: Hm, alright
Post by: Channy on September 19, 2013, 05:14:20 AM
Sounds fun to me, I'm sure the admins can keep it under control.
Title: Re: Hm, alright
Post by: rBST Cow on September 26, 2013, 01:02:29 PM
Bump.

Everyone supported this, let's make it happen.
Title: Re: Hm, alright
Post by: Keskjer on September 26, 2013, 01:30:16 PM
By everyone you mean 8 people? should probably add a poll with yes/no for this thread. See how many actually are interested, and how many say yes/no. Your call in the end.
Title: Re: Hm, alright
Post by: Teitoku Ippan on September 26, 2013, 01:42:33 PM
a poll would be a better way to understand people's side to this suggestion, but ultimately it comes down to rofl's decision
Title: Re: Hm, alright
Post by: rBST Cow on September 26, 2013, 06:28:37 PM
a poll would be a better way to understand people's side to this suggestion, but ultimately it comes down to rofl's decision

By everyone you mean 8 people? should probably add a poll with yes/no for this thread. See how many actually are interested, and how many say yes/no. Your call in the end.

Polls are the worst way to do it.  People will put yes/no without explaining why. But since you two insist then I will.


Edit: Just gotta love how people vote no but they don't even explain their reasoning.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal