General => General Discussion => Topic started by: Shriio on October 01, 2011, 04:00:03 PM General => General Discussion => Topic started by: Shriio on October 01, 2011, 04:00:03 PMI have the right to bitch about a company changing maps and guns and calling it a brand new game. If you buy MW3, you waste money. End of.Jeez Rofl...
The two are completely different types of FPS. COD is more arcade-like. BF3 will be more about immersion and realism. They can't be compared on the same scale. If you just wanna run in and shoot a shitload of rounds everywhere, get into the action quickly, and speed through games, COD is for you. If you want to employ tactics, use cover, and use your ammunition sparingly, go play BF3.Agreed, COD is more like the rush and funny things, the one player ability.
I have the right to bitch about a company changing maps and guns and calling it a brand new game. If you buy MW3, you waste money. End of.Jeez Rofl...
But i have to say this, what makes BF3 so special and so unique??
I am all in for Battlefield 3 :)
(http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/8716/24808919021350769743312.jpg)
I found this very lulzy
I am all in for Battlefield 3 :)
Really, do you think mw3 will pull it off?(http://gyazo.com/d0ffb3cd0d5bd101c89f5a7f98885b01.png)
NOPE
(http://i.imgur.com/uoiLp.jpg)
photoshop and it took me about 10 minutesHehe okay :D Funny anyway, do you thing he going to do that? :3
yes he will like on any gamephotoshop and it took me about 10 minutesHehe okay :D Funny anyway, do you thing he going to do that? :3
Lol?! :3yes he will like on any gamephotoshop and it took me about 10 minutesHehe okay :D Funny anyway, do you thing he going to do that? :3
he is famous donator for x22 did you not knowffs what are you talking about?
Both games are going to be good. BF3 has some things better things than cod, but cod has better things than BF3. Just play the one you like and don't bitch. Only will cause flame war *cough* RoflWaffle *cough*- Yes battlefield is more realistic and MW3 is more fast paced and arcade like. Play the one or ones you like. You can bitch all you want if you are so simple minded to see the main picture, enjoy flaming while im enjoying the game lol. Also, all games that come from past games like cods, and the battlefields, the next game is always basically the same thing just with new guns, effects, maps, and etc... So keep raging, i could care less, there's just no point in it. You all have your own opinion, and this is mine :3.I'm not flaming. Do you not know the difference between flaming/raging and proving a point? Apparently not. CoD will be a few new maps, the same, shitty, outdated engine and graphics, 90% of the same guns, the same "HURR RUN AROUND A MAP AND QUICKSCOPE LEGIT 360 EVERYTHING", same and/or similar maps, same exact gameplay, yet another mediocre story which will last for 3 hours(considering you are paying 60$, you should get a lot more out of the singleplayer, especially cause the multiplayer is just a complete rip from the last 10 CoDs), and best of all you'll end up paying another 30$ for maps in the future WHEN THEY SHOULD HAVE CAME WITH THE GAME TO BEGIN WITH. Have fun wasting 60$.
Both games are going to be good. BF3 has some things better things than cod, but cod has better things than BF3. Just play the one you like and don't bitch. Only will cause flame war *cough* RoflWaffle *cough*- Yes battlefield is more realistic and MW3 is more fast paced and arcade like. Play the one or ones you like. You can bitch all you want if you are so simple minded to see the main picture, enjoy flaming while im enjoying the game lol. Also, all games that come from past games like cods, and the battlefields, the next game is always basically the same thing just with new guns, effects, maps, and etc... So keep raging, i could care less, there's just no point in it. You all have your own opinion, and this is mine :3.I'm not flaming. Do you not know the difference between flaming/raging and proving a point? Apparently not. CoD will be a few new maps, the same, shitty, outdated engine and graphics, 90% of the same guns, the same "HURR RUN AROUND A MAP AND QUICKSCOPE LEGIT 360 EVERYTHING", same and/or similar maps, same exact gameplay, yet another mediocre story which will last for 3 hours(considering you are paying 60$, you should get a lot more out of the singleplayer, especially cause the multiplayer is just a complete rip from the last 10 CoDs), and best of all you'll end up paying another 30$ for maps in the future WHEN THEY SHOULD HAVE CAME WITH THE GAME TO BEGIN WITH. Have fun wasting 60$.
This is exactly what the thread is about, who will win, you should be able to complain. OP initiated a flame war with the subject of this thread.Both games are going to be good. BF3 has some things better things than cod, but cod has better things than BF3. Just play the one you like and don't bitch. Only will cause flame war *cough* RoflWaffle *cough*- Yes battlefield is more realistic and MW3 is more fast paced and arcade like. Play the one or ones you like. You can bitch all you want if you are so simple minded to see the main picture, enjoy flaming while im enjoying the game lol. Also, all games that come from past games like cods, and the battlefields, the next game is always basically the same thing just with new guns, effects, maps, and etc... So keep raging, i could care less, there's just no point in it. You all have your own opinion, and this is mine :3.I'm not flaming. Do you not know the difference between flaming/raging and proving a point? Apparently not. CoD will be a few new maps, the same, shitty, outdated engine and graphics, 90% of the same guns, the same "HURR RUN AROUND A MAP AND QUICKSCOPE LEGIT 360 EVERYTHING", same and/or similar maps, same exact gameplay, yet another mediocre story which will last for 3 hours(considering you are paying 60$, you should get a lot more out of the singleplayer, especially cause the multiplayer is just a complete rip from the last 10 CoDs), and best of all you'll end up paying another 30$ for maps in the future WHEN THEY SHOULD HAVE CAME WITH THE GAME TO BEGIN WITH. Have fun wasting 60$.
All im saying is, if you dont like a game for whatever reason, theres no need to complain about it. Just because you think its the same thing or its a waste of money is your opinion, i respect your opinion its just that you don't need to go "that game sucks, its a waste, etc..." Just play the one you like and just shut up about the other game you don't like. I'm getting both like i said because they both feature things i like and i myself, dont think its a waste of money. Saying bad things about one game will only result in a fan-boy war. You may think its bad, but to others its a great game.
I wouldn't go so far as to say that Battlefield 3 is "extremely realistic," because it's not. True, it is much more realistic compared to MW3. But I'm not here to argue about realism. The thing that I truly like best about the Battlefield franchise is, like Martinerr expressed earlier, the amount of teamwork that's required to be successful in the game. Each class is perfectly crafted to complement the skills and weaknesses of its peers. While lone-wolf players can be successful, it's a hell of a lot more challenging and discouraging to lone-wolf it than to work as a team. The teamwork encouraged in Battlefield 3 is the most appealing aspect of the game for me.
I have to say mw3 bacause ive played call of duty since world at war.What?
Or perhaps we should move on to a new style of games instead of a bunch of shooters that look the same? I am an avid BF fan, but to me BF3 looks exactly lake the bad company series, which wasn't as good(IMO) as the core 3 BF's.
We should move on from games like COD and to games like minecraft, sims, and other shit that is different than a look and shoot game. At least with say, total war or company of heroes(both extremely good games of which i love) you put strategy in it and it is a different perspective.
No? Counter Strike: Global Offensive will knock the water off both of them. Err... I mean Battlefield 3. MW3 still uses that outdated engine, because they are too damn lazy to create another one. All they care about is money. That's it. Unlike Battlefield 3, they take pride in their work. That's why it's so sexy and sleek looking.
Or perhaps we should move on to a new style of games instead of a bunch of shooters that look the same? I am an avid BF fan, but to me BF3 looks exactly lake the bad company series, which wasn't as good(IMO) as the core 3 BF's.
We should move on from games like COD and to games like minecraft, sims, and other shit that is different than a look and shoot game. At least with say, total war or company of heroes(both extremely good games of which i love) you put strategy in it and it is a different perspective.